I just came across some typographical errors. My apologies. Please refer
to the below for corrections in "<<>>".
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Tarver, Peter [MPK:4N02:EXCH]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 1998 9:40 AM
In paragraph 1 -
For a lo
This seems a bit strange. As I understand it, Argentina is a 230V
country. Typically, manufacturers obtain UL listing only for 120V
models, unless the power supply ranges from 110-240V. I would think
that for 230V ITE products with no UL listing, either a CB Certificate
to IEC 60950 or GS/TUV Ce
One of our people reported hearing the following rumor.
Has anyone heard anything relative to this?
"Is there a move underway by the U.S. Fire Marshall's Office
to up the flammability requirement standards on business
equipment? Supposedly, because of some recent office
fires, they want to push f
>Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 11:04:17 -0400
>To: EMC Discussion Group
>From: Sandi McEnery
>Subject: Argentina Safety Requirment
>
>Hi,
>
>We have a customer who has been shipping product to Argentina for some
time with no problems, however, they now have a shipment being held in
customs because they d
Greetings!
The Orange County Chapter of the IEEE EMC Society is pleased to welcome Mr.
John Osburn on Thursday, October 8th. John will be giving a presentation on
EMC Antennas and their Applications. The meeting will be held at Emulex
Network Systems, located in Costa Mesa, California.
The m
Richard -
For a long time, UL (and I believe CSA) thought any device deriving power
from a Class 2 source needed listing. In fact, they were adamantly opposed
to it, even when requests for such certification were made. UL's primary
basis was that the NEC didn't care what was supplied by a Class
I would like to point out that UL's Summer 1998 Issue of "On the Mark" (Page
19) discusses Argentina's new regulations and UL services for obtaining
Argentine approval. Please be aware that the Argentine system is still in a
state a flux, as they are going through a "shake down" period for
imp
At 05:12 PM 9/18/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Forgive my ignorance, but is the C-Tick Mark (Australia's EMC Framework)
required for
>New Zealand too?
>
>Based on what I have available, the Framework is an Australian regulation,
though the
>standards (prefaced AS/NZS) happen to be aligned (harmonized?) on
8 matches
Mail list logo
