Paul,
Thank you for your observation. The situation in many sectors is as you
say. There are exceptions and the requirements are stated to cover those
times when there is a lag between declaring the product compliant and
taking it to market.
The other reason why you should not mix the use of
My lab is just 90Km from the world's largest salt mine (Cary Salt,
Hutchinson Kansas, U.S.A.).
The mine is 0.9Km underground. We send our records there for permanent
archival.
-I'll suggest this to my superiors as a possible OATS relocation site.
[yeah, right!!]
Imagine: negligible RF and
I guess some members of this group will interested to know that there are
quite some lobbing activities underway.
Here is a position paper from AEA (American Electronic Association)
http://www.svtc.org/svtc/cleancc/weeeaea.htm and EUROBIT
http://www.eurobit.org/pages/EUROBIT/POSITION/Pos032.html
California Code of Regulations 22 CCR 12601, which gives instructions on Clear
and Reasonable Warnings required by Prop 65, can be found at
http://www.oehha.org/prop65/pdf.zip/12601.pdf. Three types of exposure to
listed chemicals, which would require warning, are defined in the regulations.
Tested to UL requirements is insufficient. The product needs to be UL
tested and UL listed.
-Original Message-
From: sb...@ctlsg.creaf.com sb...@ctlsg.creaf.com
To: EMC-PSTC (E-mail) emc-p...@ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Friday, August 06, 1999 5:06 AM
Subject:
I agree that you can't trust everyone to have common sense; however, common
sense should be used in drafting Prop 65s.
-Original Message-
From: Price, Ed ed.pr...@cubic.com
To: EMC PSTC emc-p...@ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Thursday, August 05, 1999 11:42 PM
Summary info about the WEEE Directive, relevant also to the California warning
notice required for lead content.
Producer takes responsibility for pollution
Compulsory targets by Jan 2006
target of 70% recycling or re-use by 2004
5% reuse of plastics in new products by 2004
Ban on lead,
See answers below
Regards
Chris Colgan
EMC Safety
TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
mailto:chris.col...@tagmclarenaudio.com
-Original Message-
From: Grant, Tania (Tania) [SMTP:tgr...@lucent.com]
Sent: 06 August 1999 03:18
To: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Cc: Rasko, George (George)
Hi,
Would like to seek some advise/opinion on the followings :
For AC/DC power adapter tested to UL1950(under class II insulation), what should
the labelling on the adapter have :
a) Cord connected Class II Power Units wording only
b) Cord connected Class II Power Units wording and double
Help and suggestions are appreciated from any corner!
1. What we really want is a 5x20mm fuse rated at 8.0 amps with UL, CSA,
and European agency approvals. We find that these types of fuses seem to
loose their European approvals above 6.3 amps.Why is this?
2.Are there other than
Eric:
Better take a couple of deep breaths before your start advocating trade
tariffs. I suppose that you would also advocate putting a line item
surcharge on all of your products going to Europe to cover the cost of CE?
Now, I'm not defending our Prop 65 too strongly. I think it's ridiculous
This goes back to the geek syndrome.
That is:
What did the circle say to the tangent line?
Stop touching me!
I think the salt mine was a tangent.
-Original Message-
From: Aschenberg, Mat [mailto:matt.aschenb...@echostar.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 7:17 AM
To:
12 matches
Mail list logo