I read in !emc-pstc that Doug McKean wrote (in
<004201c163fd$9beab310$3e3e3...@corp.auspex.com>) about '"Safety
Critical" etc - the future', on Fri, 2 Nov 2001:
>"John Woodgate"
>>
>> If you are referring to my post, I plan to report that there is
>> discussion here on the subject, and recount s
Scott,
Being a low frequency problem, it sounds like a likely candidate for a
common impedance coupling. Possibily through a common ground return. Mind
you, if it is Low freq in nature, series inductance [even large amounts ~ 3
mH ect...] and common-mode chokes may not work. Try checking the
g
I read in !emc-pstc that Gregg Kervill wrote (in
<00b101c164e7$6bcb40b0$7300a8c0@MENHADEN>) about '"Safety Critical" etc
- the future - Are we professionals?', on Sat, 3 Nov 2001:
>God protect us from committee decisions!
These 'committee' decisions are made by people just like you and me
(espe
God protect us from committee decisions!
Does anyone remember IEC 380 - Great electrical spec but hopeless for any
other expect (except topple.
Then can IEC 435 which missed flammability.
Now we have 950 - which is pretty through but missing a few things...
IMAGINE if the selection and de
4 matches
Mail list logo
