Hi Rich,
First, do we have clear, unambiguous definitions for our safety symbols?
Based on the very short definitions in 417, I think not.
I believe we need much more work on the definitions.
As you know, standards are not static things set in stone. If you think
that IEC 60417 needs to
Hi Richard:
You said We in the product safety industry must be very careful that we
use
symbols in strict accordance with their definitions. No issue with you
there. However, the paper states that some of these misuses were
perpetrated by people not even connected with
Rich,
Thank you for explaining that words were made from letters and sentences
were made from a mixture of words (and letters by the way). It's simply
amazing how informative these exchanges can be!
You said We in the product safety industry must be very careful that we use
symbols in strict
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Hello,
The factor of 37 came as a constant when the numbers
were plugged in appropriate units. But bascially it is
Free Space Path Loss Equation. The path loss varies
quadratically with distance hence a factor of
20logdistance.
To account for loss
In a message dated 4/17/2003, you write:
As an FYI, we see very few instances of damage on our carrier class products
due to lightning events. As such I doubt the coordination issue is really
that significant.
Hi Jim:
Thanks for your detailed discussion of the coordination problem. I
5 matches
Mail list logo
