All,
15.103 often generates questions. You can search
and read the FCC interpretations database online
here:
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/ri/FccEasRi.cfm
Best Regards,
Eric Lifsey
At 2:26 PM -0700 5/10/04, Pettit, Ghery wrote:
>Chapter and verse -
>
>ยง15.103 Exempted devices. - Th
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Bob,
I don't recall modifying electrical plugs but I do tear off mattress tag
that says "Do Not Remove."
-doug
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Robert Johnson
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004
Hi Brian,
before you decide, you owe it to yourself to add the New Schaffner ESD gun to
your list of products to evaluate. I believe the model is a 438.
Cheers,
Derek.
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at
Hi Brian,
before you decide, you owe it to yourself to add the New Schaffner ESD gun to
your list of products to evaluate. I believe the model is a 438.
Cheers,
Derek.
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at
Brian,
I've used the Haefely and the Keytek systems you mention. For ease of
handling, the Mini-Zap wins, but if you need very high voltages the Haefely
has more capability. Personally I like the Schaffner 435 better than either
one. It is lighter weight, more comfortable to hold, swappable ba
Good People
Have recieved several requests about the GM HALT standard, so will post to the
group.
Sorry, but this is a copyrighted publication; and my employer would be really
upset if I did something "criminal" on their time. I paid for and downloaded a
copy.
The standard is GMW8287, "Highly
Brian
We have both the Keytek MiniZap and the Schaffner NSG435
I find the Keytek slightly easier to use. However my equipment is more
sensative to the Schaffner ESD Pulse. So I prefer to test with the Schaffner.
YMMV
John Merrill
Principal Regulatory Engineer
Schneider Automation Inc.
Dear Group,
I want to ask you, if battery calculators and battery quartz clocks and
watches (advertise gadgets) should be tested according to EMC directive? And
if not, why?
Best regards
Mike
I am purchasing an ESD gun and am considering the following products:
Haefely PESD 1610
HV Technologies ESD3000DM1
Thermo Keytek MZ-15/EC
I would appreciate all critiques on these products.
Regards,
Brian Epstein
Sr Regulatory Compliance Engineer
Veeco Instruments
brian.epst...@veeco.com
I am not certain how one would test or verify a climate. So I do not know what
you are looking for, but here is a shot or two of some of the garbage I
read...
(not all are still active, but archives but be useful)
sci.chem
sci.environment
sci.space.science
sci.engr.heat-vent-ac
listserv.ic
Hi all,
Here is an employment opportunity in Southern California.
Josh
Product Safety / EMC Engineer
Req# 89912
Qualifications:
BSEE or equivalent experience
Minimum 3 years experience in the fields of product safety, and/or
electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)
Does anyone know of a similar forum to the emc-pstc which deals with
climatic testing?
Mike Hurley
Mead Testing
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To cancel your subscripti
Ryan,
The answer to your question is simple enough. There is a list of harmonized
standards listed under
the EMC Directive. Assuming that you are referring to ITE, then the product
family standards EN55022
(emissions) and EN55024 (immunity) would apply. EN55024 itself sets limits and
provides re
13 matches
Mail list logo