pat_law...@condordc.com wrote (in
)
about 'Information Technology Symbols', on Fri, 19 Aug 2005:
>The IEC has published several documents concerning graphical symbols.
>Here is the search result using the phrase 'graphical symbols':
>http://www.iec.ch/cgi-bin/procgi.pl/www/iecwww.p?wwwlang=E&ww
lfresea...@aol.com wrote (in <1de.4211be75.30379...@aol.com>) about
'Commercial EMC software', on Fri, 19 Aug 2005:
>As I've stressed, the standards are so poorly written that there are
>interpretations of how the test should be run.
But do you at least try to do something about that? Such as m
lfresea...@aol.com wrote (in <1a6.3d3df2dc.30376...@aol.com>) about 'RF
Susceptibility: Sweep v/s spot check', on Fri, 19 Aug 2005:
>Perhaps standards should be written by folks that actually run
>tests Having worked on come committees, it's fascinating to see
>opinions/political positions
3 matches
Mail list logo