Brian:
You are not going to be able to mitigate the situation with a label. The
rules are the rules and effectively the Law.
Assuming your unit is operating in the ISM band and is and ISM device falling
under Part 18 of the FCC Rules, then it must comply with the applicable rules.
The label p
Generally speaking, Evaluation sample does not require certification for small
quantities. However, those evaluation samples should be clearly labeled “Not
For sale, evaluation only”. For example FCC requires the following labeling
on the evaluation samples per Part 2, 2.803.
“This device has
For Engineering Evaluation pwbs – I would say no. No certifications are
required.
Best Regards
Charles Grasso
Compliance Engineer
Echostar Communications Corp.
Tel: 303-706-5467
Fax: 303-799-6222
Cell: 303-204-2974
Pager/Short Message: 3032042...@vtext.com
mailto:3032042...@vtext.com>
Email: c
In message <012401c6e333$10cf5be0$150bb...@colorado.linear.com>, dated
Thu, 28 Sep 2006, David Cuthbert writes
>My company sells engineering evaluation PCBs with our IC?s on them. I
>believe that they are supplied worldwide. Some products contain or use
>oscillators that are above 10 kHz. And p
And don't forget the need to be RoHS compliant.
Robert Sem
Sr. Product Regulations Engineer
Intel Corporation
5200 NE Elam Young Pkwy. MS JF#-410
Hillsboro, OR 97124 U.S.
Phone (503) 264-4430
Fax (503) 264-0124
robert.k@intel.com
_
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@i
If the board is intended to used by an end user which an then this board
falls under the definition of article 2, no. 2. a) and fulfills the definition
of "apparatus" (article 2, no. 1. b)) which requires a CE mark (2004/108/EC).
That is confirmed by the new EMC act (draft EMC act dated 2006-09-
As far as I know, you do not need to meet FCC rules or the EMC directive if
this is just an evaluation board to let engineers evaluate your integrated
circuits. You should include a notice indicating that if the board does
cause interference, it is the users responsibility to correct the problem.
A question for the compliance guys:
My company sells engineering evaluation PCBs with our IC’s on them. I
believe that they are supplied worldwide. Some products contain or use
oscillators that are above 10 kHz. And potentially some boards have voltages
that exceed 42 volts.
Are we require
I thought about that, but our application doesn't fit in that group.
Regards,
Brian Epstein
Sr Regulatory Compliance Engineer
Veeco Instruments
ph: 805-967-2700 ext 2315
fx: 805-967-7717
ce: 805-591-9587
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 11
Dear Members,
A side-by-side comparison table between the second and the third edition of
IEC 61000-4-3 has been completed. Thank you very much to those who have
helped.
If you are interested in a copy, please let me know.
Best regards,
Grace
On 8/31/06, Grace Lin wrote:
Dear Members,
What is the RF in your product used for? Is FCC part 18 similar to EN55011
where in addition to having ISM bands, there is a Group 2 limit which can be
used in special cases? The Class A group 2 limit is quite relaxed. The
EN55011 standard defines Group 2 ISM equipment as, "group 2 contains all IS
Brian,
You are correct. FCC Part 18 compliance (for the US market) is required.
Bill Stumpf
D.L.S. Electronics
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Brian Epstein
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 12:17 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: FCC radiated emissions
We have
In message
<9b547b0bf4b65e4abc07a5a18fd7a74285f...@sboexch1.int.veeco.com>, dated
Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Brian Epstein writes
>Specifically, I have been asked if there is no way that we could use
>labels or disclaimers to comply (I told them, "no".). What do people
>say?
Other than a label 'On no
We have a product that incorporates an RF source. This source is required for
the internal operation of the equipment, that is, the product could be placed
inside a Faraday cage and still operate, unlike a broadcast transmitter which
must radiate to the outside environment to operate as intended.
In message
, dated
Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Julian Jones writes
>have had some discussion on NSA with auditors. I'd be interested in
>everyone's view
>
>The NSA shows
>
>Horizontal @ 10m to be done at 1m height
>
>Vertical @ 10m it shows 1M and 1.5M
>
>Our view has been that for Vertical either he
The FAA today released a revision to its rules on the transport of
Lithium Batteries. I have load the file on the community site (see link
in the footer).
49 CFR Part 172
[Docket No. 04-19886 (HM-224E)] RIN 2137-AE05
Hazardous Materials: Prohibition on the Transportation of Primary
Lithium Batte
An informal get-together for the good people of this Listserv during the
Symposium ?
luck,
Brian
> -Original Message-
> From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Jim
> Bacher
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 5:49 AM
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: 2006 IEEE PSE
Julian,
ANSI C63.4 Section 5.4 defines the parameters for NSA measurements, including
1m and 1.5m (transmit antenna) for vertical polarization using broadband
antennas. The receive antenna shall be varied in height from 1 to 4 meters.
Bill
Bill Stumpf
D.L.S. Electronics
166 South Carter Stre
have had some discussion on NSA with auditors. I'd be interested in everyone's
view
The NSA shows
Horizontal @ 10m to be done at 1m height
Vertical @ 10m it shows 1M and 1.5M
Our view has been that for Vertical either height is acceptable, but we are
being told that both 1M and 1.5M need t
To get a room at the discounted rate in the block of rooms the 2006
Symposium committee has made arrangements for, you must book the room
before October 1. See http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium for more
details.
As a reminder:
The advanced program schedule is now available at:
http://
20 matches
Mail list logo
