Communication over Power Line.

2006-11-21 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Dear all, Who can tell me if a signal of i.e. 100MHz communicate over an a.c. mains power line, for CE, the EUT should under EMC directive or RTTE directive? What testing standards should it refer to ? Thanks in advance. Regards, Daniel Liang. _ Do You Yahoo!?

RE: Amendment level for IEC / EN 60335-2-76

2006-11-21 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi George, There is already a limitation of 5J per impulse in 22.108, does A11 further reduce the level? Thanks and best regards, Clif Brick _ From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of George Suceveanu Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:13 PM To:

RE: 3rd Party Test Labs for UL

2006-11-21 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Group, What kind of testing are we talking about here? Thank you. Rob Kado EMC Product Development Engineer DaimlerChrysler EMC Laboratory CIMS 481-47-20 800 Chrysler Drive Auburn Hills, MI 48326 Desk: (248) 576-6915 Mobile: (248) 467-0639 Fax: (248) 576-7045

RE: 3rd Party Test Labs for UL

2006-11-21 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Richard, You are absolutely correct. My apologies for not thinking before I typed. -Jeff _ From: Stone, Richard [mailto:rst...@cantata.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 8:27 AM To: Gilbert, Jeff; CNewton; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: 3rd Party Test Labs for UL Hi

RE: 3rd Party Test Labs for UL

2006-11-21 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi Jeff, Carl, I think the intent of this forum is to post the group here on alternatives, but also not to use any negativity toward a specific company by name. I realize it isn’t easy to convey your question, but it’s important to keep names clear on here. It could impact a company in an

RE: 3rd Party Test Labs for UL

2006-11-21 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
I would also be interested in finding some alternatives. Unfortunately, the lead times for project completion have grown along with the price. -Jeff _ From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of CNewton Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 1:14 PM To:

RE: FCC Part 15 exemptions

2006-11-21 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In the USA, military equipment is given special reserved military spectrum space. Subject to international treaties allocating the spectrum, the the NTIA http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/aboutntia/aboutntia.htm is the top level. The NTIA has their OSM

RE: Will UL506 be replaced by UL5085?

2006-11-21 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Correction to my previous post. As usual, I had to find out from CSA about what is happening with UL standards. Note that I have no record of any notification from UL of 506 being superceded or withdrawn. Following is from the CSA web site: This is the common CSA and UL standard for low voltage

Re: EMC RTTE requirements of Macau in China.

2006-11-21 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hello Daniel, I believe that Macau used to follow the requirements of Hong Kong, but I am not positive. You can get more information from the Macau telecommunication authority. DIRECÇÃO DOS SERVIÇOS DE CORREIOS E TELECOMUNICAÇÕES DE MACAU Largo do Senado Macau +853 574 491; fax: +853 336 603

RE: FCC Part 15 exemptions

2006-11-21 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In the UK, visibility of the US of A rules etc. regarding transmitting are not clearly visible. We tend to rely on the people we are dealing with to tell us what the requirements are when we want to demonstrate equipment in the US of A. The problem is, some of the people we deal with have no idea

RE: FCC Part 15 exemptions

2006-11-21 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Virtually all military equipment is put out to bid. As part of this process the military will write up a specification contract indicating equipment performance, function, operation, fail-pass, etc. I can almost assure you that if the military does not want DFS2 then that is what they will specify