RE: FCC Requirement Note

2008-09-12 Thread dward
Hi Andrew Grant notes, while some being generic, are always applicable to the particular grant on which they occur. In this case the source of the note is the device itself. The limit to gain is most likely due to the MPE caused by the gains listed being able to meet the separation distance spec

Re: FCC Requirement Note

2008-09-12 Thread Mark Briggs
Andy The source for the note is probably the FCC grant for the device. After a quick look on the FCC's search page at https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm I am guessing that the module you are looking at

RE: FCC Requirement Note

2008-09-12 Thread Ilarina, Alvin
Hi, Follow the links below to review the sections of the CFR referenced in your note. If I understand what you are looking for correctly you may want to pay particular attention to §1.1307 paragraph (b) where “must contain a statement” is referenced. Title 47: Telecommunication PART 1—PRACTICE

RE: CE marking in-house equipment.

2008-09-12 Thread Lothar Schmidt
It is not limited to placing devices on the market it is also for the operation of the device. See scope of the R&TTE for example 1. This Directive establishes a regulatory framework for the placing on the market, free movement and putting into service in the Community of radio equipment and te

Re: CE marking in-house equipment.

2008-09-12 Thread John Woodgate
In message , dated Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Nick Williams writes: >It sounds complex, but in fact its not only clear but also logical I think it can be very simple (if a bit unsubtle). CE marking is addressed to Customs and regulatory authorities, and shows that a piece of equipment can freely cro

Re. laser safety and Li-Po batteries

2008-09-12 Thread Peter Weichel
Hi guy´s, Thank you very much for all your kind answers, i will study the provide information carefully. Have a nice weekend all ;-) Best regards Peter - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc di

Re: FCC Requirement Note

2008-09-12 Thread Charles Blackham
Andy It sounds like the equipment concerned does not have an integral antenna. Testing would have primarily have been done conducted at the antenna port, with limits adjusted based by the highest gain of the antennas that the manufacturer declares may be used with the unit With regard to RF expos

Re: Laser safety and Li-Po batteries

2008-09-12 Thread Paolo Peruzzi
Hi Peter, IEC 60825-1 is the reference standard for laser devices labelling. In its EN version it is the reference for EU market. In the US the reference is 21 CFR part 1040.10, but FDA also recognizes IEC 60825-1. regards, Paolo --- Paolo Peruzzi Regulatory

FCC Requirement Note

2008-09-12 Thread Andrew McCallum
Been given the note below but need to find the original source for reference can anyone help please? FCC Requirements Note: The antenna gain, including cable loss, must not exceed 3.0 dBi at 1900 MHz / 1.6 dBi at 850 M0Hz for mobile operating configurations and 7.0 dBi at 1900 MHz / 2.3 dBi at 85

RE: Laser safety and Li-Po batteries

2008-09-12 Thread Barker, Neil
Peter I'll decline to answer your question re lasers, as I am sure others are more knowledgeable than I am. In answer to your question about batteries, I answered a similar question last week. The reply was:- Lithium batteries may be shipped installed in product. The UN No. is 3091. IATA regu