Re: Conducted Emission Test Software

Hi Tim, The Teseq Compliance 3/5 software will control the HP 8566, and the HP 8568 with or without the Pre-selector and QP adapter. Please let me know off line if you would like to know more. Sincerely, Derek Walton emcp...@aol.com wrote: > Hello group, > > I need to know if anyone knows w

Conducted Emission Test Software

Hello group, I need to know if anyone knows where to get conducted emissions test software to work with an HP 8566B spectrum analyzer. I currently have the old HP 85869PC software which is the PC equivalent of what used to run on those old HP computers with the green display. It gets the job don

Re: Compliant plus compliant does not equal compliant!

Michael/Gert When I worked as a design engineer for an ITE integrator, many manufacturers of subassemblies disagreed that their (sub)system had to be EMC compliant in all situations. Most had an assumption of what they considered "reasonable" shielding effectiveness and immunity control that the

RE: ANSI C63.4/CISPR 22 Testing Configuration

It is perfectly legal (in Europe) to skip those tests that are not relevant to a device, as long as you can support your decision. After all, your signing a DoC, saying that you accept liability for it’s conformance. How you came to this is irrelevant, as long as you can technically prove (or

RE: [PSES] ANSI C63.4/CISPR 22 Testing Configuration

Tim, I’ll provide a personal opinion. It may not be to the letter of the standard and does not reflect what the customers that buy equipment from the company I work for expect. You may notice some cynicism as well. Customers and standards are not always reasonable or practical. I see this a

ANSI C63.4/CISPR 22 Testing Configuration

Hello Group, I have a couple of questions regarding the minimum PC configuration when testing a USB device such as a mouse and the minimum testing requirements. CISPR 22 contains the following: For a personal computer or a personal computer peripheral, the minimum configuration consists of th

RE: [PSES] New EMC Requirements Deadlines for 2009

Andy For EMC, if you have to look down the right hand “DOCOPODOSS” column of the OJ list of harmonised standards at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newappro ch/standardization/harmstds/reflist/emc.html you’ll find a few more. You should do a similar exercise for other applicable d

New EMC Requirements Deadlines for 2009

Hello Everyone, We in the medical laboratory industry had a January 2009 deadline for compliance with the updated EN61326-1 standard, and parts thereof. What I'm trying to find out though, is if there are other product categories in other industries that also had/have a deadline for compliance t

RE: Compliant plus compliant does not equal compliant!

>The best approach -IMHO- to control EMI is to minimize potential emissions at the source, >reducing the need for filtering and shielding. This must happen during the design >and must involve EMC experts. An approach which is not generalized yet - unfortunately But that doesn’t take care of p

RE: Compliant plus compliant does not equal compliant!

This is the unfortunate case of ideal world vs.. real world. A manufacturer of a subassembly will not design for the EMC behavior of other components in the target system unless he is really aware and involved in the system integration or forced to do so by other means. A manufacturer of a ca

BR1326A

Hello all, I am trying to find a lab who can test to the defence toxicity requirements BR1326A. Google has shown nothing. Anyone out there in 'emc-pstc land ' have or know of capability in UK ? Rgds