Christine,
Please refer to my blog which has a link to Japan ROHS requirements
http://globalcompliance.blogspot.com/
You can subcrivbe to the blog. I will soon post more details on Japanese and
Korean ROHS
very shortly
You can also send questions you may have to my colleague at work Geoffe
Try this as a starting point. Toward the bottom of the page they talk about
the Japanese Green Initiative.
http://pc1.db1.co.jp/jeita_eps/jmoss_en.htm
Regards,
Scott
Christine Rodham wrote:
Dear List Members,
One of our resellers has an opportunity in Japan that requires our product to
mee
Craig,
You made a good catch, and you are correct.
Having run a polymeric-enclosed equipment through North American listing, you
might find that if you have a non-brittle, think, and strong polymeric
enclosure, it might not have any effect in going down to -50 °C and being
impacted.
google/bing/yahoo is your friend.
Japan Green is based on the stuff found in JIG-101A; which can be said to be
based on RoHS, ELV, and REACH directives. There are several schedules of
substances, depending on how they are incorporated into the end product, and
the manufacturing process and other t
Dear List Members,
One of our resellers has an opportunity in Japan that requires our product to
meet or comply with the Japan Green Initiative.
Can anyone shed any light on this requirement for Japan. We are EU RoHS
compliant but have not pursued any environmental compliance for Japan.
We
Is there a CB report, and does it line-out or not include NDs ?
Conformity to any particular national requirement is not necessary, but
many CBTLs/NBs will want to write something in the report for conditions
of acceptability.
Brian
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of
Good afternoon,
Note 3 of Cl. 4.1 of 60950-22 states "In Finland, Norway and Sweden, the
temperature in winter may be extremely low. For OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT this will
demand special design so that the equipment can stand transport, erection and
operation/service at temperatures down to -50 deg C."
Dear Tony,
The R&TTE Compliance Association give guidance on such matters, see download
section TG11 “Guidance on NB opinion where harmonised standard not applied.
http://rtteca.com/html/download_area.htm
I quote
“Although not mandatory, where a relevant harmonised standard exists, it
sho
Dear Tony,
In case you use harmonized standards and frequencies under the directive there
is no need to use a Notified Body. Than you are entitled to draw up your own
DOC. When you are using other evidence than you are obliged to contact a
Notified Body
Telefication bv
www.telefication.co
The whole point of Notified Body status is that it is supposed to
denote the technical competence required to make judgements about
whether or not a product meets the essential requirements of the
Directives, and on occasions this judgement requires the direct
application of the Essential Requi
I'd appreciate some wisdom and advice!
How rigorously should Notified Bodies (R&TTED & EMCD) require full use of
Harmonised Standards? Do they have scope to give positive opinions on the
basis of alternative evidence and technical justifications rather than testing
to Harmonised Standards even
To me, consumer products are products sold to the general public no matter
where they are used.
Bob Heller
3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel: 651- 778-6336
Fax: 651-778-6252
=
12 matches
Mail list logo
