Thanks to the (2) people who replied. Never mind - no interest.
Do not fear the code monkey; fear the code.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 3:36 PM
To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org'
Subject: data tools for compliance people ?
Ha
In message <1312396958.9324.yahoomail...@web39603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>,
dated Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Bill Owsley writes:
>But come up with a new technology, one that has significant potential
>for causing interference, and they are all over it. For example
>software defined radios
But not PLT, it s
Grace,
The easiest free way is to ask via the KDB website. If what you want to do is
outside the current rules they will tell you.
To change the rules you need money time and a strong stomach. Part 1 of the
Rules section C has the Rule making Procedures, starts with a Petition for
Rulemaking
L
I've been told back when I did TCB work, if a spectrum holder/owner complains,
they get attention, or if there are public complains, the FCC will look into
it. If it can be demonstrated that there is a problem not already addressed by
the regulations, they will consider it.
To add an exempted d
Hi Grace
I was working at the FCC lab at the time (Mike is just a kid compared to me)
and that's pretty much the thinking that was going on.
best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
On Aug 3, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Mike Violette wrote:
Hi Grace,
And, in the NEC at least, 'continuous' means 3 hours or more.
___
_
Ralph McDiarmid | Schneider Electric | Renewable Energies Business |
CANADA | Regulatory Compliance Engineering
From: Brian Oconn
Tom,
Thank you very much for seconding Mike's comments.
How easy/difficult to have FCC add exempted devices? How and where to start?
Best regards,
Grace
2011/8/3 Thomas Cokenias
Hi Grace
I was working at the FCC lab at the time (Mike is just a kid compared
to me)
and t
In all the years of using household appliances, only the old vacuum cleaner
motors had any noticeable effect - the TV over the air would get lots of "snow"
scattered white noise on the signal.
The water heater, and I have had tanks and instant on types, have relays that
click seldom when not in
Mike, I agree and also that the digital device is not the main
function/purpose of the appliance. Items like a digital clock in a microwave
is not what you would worry about. Similar to why equipment that has dial or
display lighting does not fall under the lighting standard EN 55015.
Bob Heller
Hi Grace,
Good to hear from you, too.
I think the FCC exempted appliances because during the original incarnation of
the Rules (Docket 20780 circa 1979—yes, I am dating myself) there was scant
idea that microprocessors would be so widely dispersed and installed in almost
any device imaginab
"...concerned that much of the globe believes the language spoken in the
U.S. is considered English..."
-- paraphrased quote from a Galway engineer
"...you are a subversive - mostly through speech."
-- a former employer
"(continuous) current-carrying capacity
ampacity (US)
maximum value of el
Good Morning, Mike,
It is good to hear from you.
I would like to share with you and members my findings/thoughts, based on some
measurement I took lately.
Turning on and off relays with 16A/heavy load (high current?) creates big
spikes (clicks). The amplitude of the spikes does not compl
The appliance manufacturers had an effective lobbying campaign when the rules
were written!
Mike Violette
Washington Laboratories & American Certification Body
mi...@wll.com
+1 240 401 1388
On Aug 3, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Grace Lin wrote:
Dear Members,
Does anyone know
Dear Members,
Does anyone know the reason FCC exempts devices listed under FCC §15.103(d) as
quoted below?
“(d) A digital device utilized exclusively in an appliance, e.g., microwave
over, dishwasher, clothes dryer, air conditioner (central or window), etc.”
FCC KDB 772105 clarify the exem
In message
, dated Tue, 2 Aug 2011,
ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com writes:
>I see that the IEE Wiring Regulations
IET Regulations now, aka BS7671
>use "current-carrying capacity" not the word "ampacity" we see in codes
>here.
Yes, this is a US English word that Brits have to learn. R
15 matches
Mail list logo
