Hi Ron,
The ACMA are confident the new system will be in place July 1, although we
are sceptical.
Regards,
Martin.
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Ron Pickard
RPQ
Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012 2:17 PM
To: 'Martin Garwood'; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Su
Hi Martin,
Thank you for the detailed brief summary. Does anyone know if the ACMA
expects this to be in place and functioning by their effectivity date or
will it be delayed. Have you heard if there any expectation or rumblings
from the ACMA that this will be delayed?
Also, if Sergei German
Monrad
>My understanding is that unless the DOC cites the current harmonized
>standards,
>then a company must go to a notified body to get an exception and cite that
>finding/exception in the DOC
That is not required - the use of a NB is completely voluntary under the EMC
Directive as per Art
In message <4f5e43dd.90...@oracle.com>, dated Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Monrad
Monsen writes:
By the way, the Europe Commission issued Decision 2010/571/EU on 24 Sep
2010 that announced expiration dates for several RoHS exemptions that
were within a year of the decision. Fortunately, the more freque
John,
Regarding the question "Are you implying that a notified body would
freely support a product not updating to comply with new revisions of
the harmonized standards?", you wrote:
> Yes: It's possible. For example, an update might well require
> emission testing above 1 GHz. If the product c
Using a standard that gives a presumption of conformity has obvious
benefits, both in the legal protection of due diligence and in meeting
customer expectations. It would be rather perverse not to do so if there is
a standard that is a good fit to the product. ITE is clearly the type of
product w
UL923 -> potatoes + magnetron + transformer + fan
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Scott Xe
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 2:37 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: TCOs in microwave oven
In microwave ovens, there are a number of TCO
In message <4f5e1878.2000...@oracle.com>, dated Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Monrad
Monsen writes:
You made a very interesting statement ... especially for someone whose
e-mail address indicates that you are in Europe. You said:
You have also complicated the issue by supposing that changed
standards
Many threads and images of flash damage here: http://forums.mikeholt.com/
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Mark Hone
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 8:47 AM
To: EMC-PSTC
Subject: Flash injury - a little OT but not too much I hope
Dear Colleagu
Dear Colleagues,
I give Electrical Health and Safety lectures here at work and one of the best
props is a set photos of injuries to concentrate people’s minds at the start.
I have one black and white one of someone’s hand showing flash injury
blackening, which came from a washing machine I thin
John,
You made a very interesting statement ... especially for someone whose
e-mail address indicates that you are in Europe. You said:
> You have also complicated the issue by supposing that changed standards
> (as distinct from legislation) are "mandatory" -- they aren't.
You are correct that
All,
There will be a Northeast Product Safety Society / CNEC
Product Safety Engineering Society meeting on Wednesday, March 28th, at the
Holiday Inn, Boxborough MA. A social hour
with light refreshments will begin at 7:00 PM and the technical meeting will
start at 7:30 PM. Bob Johnson ill b
12 matches
Mail list logo
