Re: [PSES] New EU Directives

The NLF requires the importer and/or manufacturer name and address on the product. It is effective for the market surveillance to track the responsible party rather than previous trade name/mark that must be registered in EU. In terms of responsibility, the local importer still holds the legal re

Re: [PSES] Thru insulation requirements

Mr. Perkins, Am not certain if you are looking for stuff to support standards development, or theoretical stuff to support a paper. But here is what this little redneck mind is aware of: http://www.usbr.gov/power/data/fist/fist3_1/vol3-1.pdf (the original was useful when started on MV and HV

[PSES] Thru insulation requirements

PSNEtters, Solid insulation requirements are not new; IEC 60664, among other standards, has dealt with this for some time. IEC 61010 (and its variants) have introduced solid insulation requirements in the 3rd Ed of the standard. Has this change resulted in published pa

[PSES] Review: Keith Armstrong's "EMC Design Techniques"

Hi All, I just reviewed Keith Armstrong's wonderfully practical book, "EMC Design Techniques for Electronic Engineers". While light on really deep theory, he provides just the right amount for good understanding sufficient to understand how to design products for EMC compliance. Highly recomme

Re: [PSES] CISPR 32, colour bar with moving element (ITU-R BT.1729)

On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 13:03:18 -0600, monrad monsen wrote: > I just found your posting of the ITU-R BT.1729 colour bar test > pattern. This is great! > > Does this fully implement the ITU-R BT.1729 colour bar test pattern? No, as I wrote "These colorbars (test patterns) were derived from ITU-R

Re: [PSES] New EU Directives

On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 23:20:06 +0800, Scott Xe wrote: > Thanks! What is the major impact on own brand labelers? NLF directives such as 2014/30/EU defines "manufacturer" as "any natural or legal person who manufactures apparatus or **has apparatus designed or manufactured, and markets that appar

Re: [PSES] CISPR 32, colour bar with moving element (ITU-R BT.1729)

CISPR 32 requires the color bars with a moving element. What that moving element is isn't nailed down in the standard. The reason for the moving element is that we (CISPR SC I) are trying to harmonize CISPR 32 (emissions) and CISPR 35 (immunity) to the maximum extent possible. You need a movi

Re: [PSES] EN55032 and the Digital Television/Monitor Reference Test Pattern of ITU-R BT.1729

Here is the link to Tom Sato's site. http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/scrolling-h/colorbar.html This email message and attachments may contain confidential and proprietary information.  Any unauthorized use is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by repl

Re: [PSES] CISPR 32, colour bar with moving element (ITU-R BT.1729)

Hi Tom, I just found your posting of the ITU-R BT.1729 colour bar test pattern. This is great! Does this fully implement the ITU-R BT.1729 colour bar test pattern? ** BOUNCING BALL: I couldn't find anything in the standard that mentions a bouncing ball, but I like the feature and one could

Re: [PSES] EN55032 and the Digital Television/Monitor Reference Test Pattern of ITU-R BT.1729

Mr. Tom Sato has some of the bouncing ball stuff source published on his web site. And have seen other sites with 1729 stuff. Brian From: monrad monsen [mailto:monrad.mon...@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 10:33 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] EN55032 and the Digital

[PSES] EN55032 and the Digital Television/Monitor Reference Test Pattern of ITU-R BT.1729

Hi! For EN55032:2012, stand alone monitors must be emissions tested with a "standard television colour bar signal according to ITU-R BT 1729 with an additional small moving element." This signal is defined in ITU-R BT.1729

Re: [PSES] New EU Directives

In message , dated Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Scott Xe writes: Thanks! What is the major impact on own brand labelers? Either the original manufacturer's name and address must be on the product label or the own-brand company has to accept the full responsibility as if it were the manufacturer (at l

Re: [PSES] New EU Directives

Yes, we need to study the new RED and its impact. Thanks and regards, Scott On 6/6/14 1:27 am, "John Woodgate" wrote: > In message , dated Fri, 6 Jun 2014, > Scott Xe writes: > >> Is there any reason behind to have LVD, EMC and R&TTE directives >> updated in similar time? On R&TTE, the chan

Re: [PSES] New EU Directives

Thanks! What is the major impact on own brand labelers? Regards, Scott On 6/6/14 5:53 am, "T.Sato" wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 00:49:58 +0800, > Scott Xe wrote: > >> Is there any reason behind to have LVD, EMC and R&TTE directives updated in >> similar time? > > To align them with NLF,