Testing, testing, 1, 2, 3...
:) br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety Engineer
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201 fone/fax
p.perk...@ieee.org
-
This message is from the IEEE
I am not at all familiar with this category of products so please excuse my
ignorance which is an industrial cut-off saw with a 5hp electric motor for
cutting steel rods, and such.
Most of these basic model saws have no high frequency devices and brushless AC
motors so they do not generate
Hello all,
Does anyone have a paper/info on the problems of (and hopefully the solutions
for!) ESD protection
on the USB3.0 interface?
Best Regards
Charles Grasso
Compliance Engineer
Echostar Communications
(w) 303-706-5467
(c) 303-204-2974
(t) 3032042...@vtext.com
(e)
It's generally best to install transient protection on the data lines. Several
companies make devices for USB 3.0. I have some info here:
http://www.edn.com/electronics-blogs/the-emc-blog/4422551/Protect-Circuits-From-ESD
Cheers, Ken
___
Kenneth Wyatt
Wyatt Technical
Just finished with a box having USB port - what a pain. Test, testing, and yet
more tests are the only way to go.
Lotsa stuff and papers from TI, On semi, TE, Littelfuse, etc. If you are very
lucky, and the space aliens do interfere, you may be able to find a FAE that
actually knows this
Hi Doug:
You are correct. One-half hour to set up, seven
hours to test, and one-half hour to record results
and take down. Eight-hour day. Works for most
equipment.
For small equipment, it is a long test. For large
equipment (intended for long-term operation), it
may be too
Whatever the reason, may have to go back 100 years. Go to books.google and read
Practical testing of electrical machines by Leonard Oulto. Remember that the
periods for some test sequences are similar. Same time period also found in
other standards for some types of mold stress-relief tests,
testing, 1, 2 3...
:) br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety Engineer
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201 fone/fax
p.perk...@ieee.org
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
All,
Today I was reviewing an output overload requirement and once again there
is that ubiquitous number of 7 hours in the test duration. I have seen
this in a wide variety of tests such as power supply output overloads and
short circuits, locked rotor tests, battery reversal tests and so on. Of
Which is why many of these Type Tests should be automated - human testers miss
too much stuff during a long-term test. And choose to not live at work for the
15 day tests required for some of the over-loads that must be done on
employer's stuff.
Brian
From: Richard Nute
FYI:
Google has now made their Google Earth Pro available for free (it used to
cost $400 for a 1 year license, but demand is so low that it looks like they
gave up trying to squeeze some money out of this version).
Heres what the Pro can do that the non-Pro version cant:
* Print
Thanks! Did you mean CENELEC's amendment from A11 for standard no, 6 and
A1 for standard no, 5?
Regards,
Scott
On 31 Jan, 2015, at 2:11 am, John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk wrote:
In message 30kyfuxz57yuf...@jmwa.demon.co.uk, dated Fri, 30 Jan 2015, John
Woodgate
I have been known to leave tests unattended but only with some pretty
extraordinary protections in place. Hardware based interlocking systems with
supervisory features. I used to get inspired by looking around elevator control
rooms. All relay based controls in those days.
As for data
I installed Pro last night and it went very smoothly. I am hopeful I can do much more than just see pretty images however. One of my latest personal projects is geospacial data visualization and GIS. Check it out here,http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/articles/googleearthasmapviewer/Now, combine
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 47 Telecommunication Chapter 1
Subchapter A Part 15
15.103 Exempted devices.
(c) A digital device used exclusively as industrial, commercial, or medical
test equipment.
Sounds like it would be FCC part 15 exempt providing the user stops operating
the
Scott,
I think the CENELEC standards start at 50xxx, and IEC standards start at
60xxx 55xxx. That means CENELEC amendments to:
EN 50xxx standards start at A1
EN 60xxx EN 55xxx standards start at A11.
Pat
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Scott Xe scott...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks! Did you
16 matches
Mail list logo