Hello group,
I'm being ask what is the certification process for a DAB receiver?
I need to know the proper steps one must take to certify a DAB receiver?
Looking to go to EU / AS/NZ / Canada.
I've run across EN 50248:2001 anything more up to date I need to know about?
Thanks,
Michael Sundstrom
Hello Dieter,
In addition to the responses you already received (which I like), I would
ask you to check that your host ITE product is really 'ancillary equipment',
as defined in EN 301 489-1.
I think that as others have pointed out, your host product will most likely
continue to need to
In message
2bbcb6c346d8e443ab98b6689119d67830a62...@olawpa-exmb05.ad.garmin.com,
dated Wed, 27 May 2015, Sundstrom, Mike mike.sundst...@garmin.com
writes:
I?m being ask what is the certification process for a DAB receiver?
I need to know the proper steps one must take to certify a DAB
Dear members,
I am adding a radio (WiFi module) to an ITE class A product. The product is
tested under CISPR 22/24. I was told now that, because of the radio, the
standard to apply is EN 301489-1, and therefore my product has to meet the
class B of EN 55022 for emissions.
My opinion is that
The 2 step testing approach is allowed only if both devices (IT +
module) are physically separate and are connected
only to be coupled on actual use (like an audio receiver and its power
amplifier)
The link between EN 301 489-x and Class B is there already since 2001 or
so.
And was made in
No, the EN 301 489-x standard is concerned with the auxiliary apparatus
to
the transmitter, being your device, and contains no Class A conditions.
The radio module has its own approval , different per transmission
system.
EN 55022 is the only standard allowing Class A for residential
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA48920ADED@ZEUS.cetest.local,
dated Wed, 27 May 2015, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
g.grem...@cetest.nl writes:
The link between EN 301 489-x and Class B is there already since 2001
or so.
Yes, but things and thinking change over 14
In message
99532047d6a52847ab271f822ae9efdc0177787...@cktexmb03.cds.int, dated
Wed, 27 May 2015, Paasche, Dieter dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com
writes:
My opinion is that product and radio have to be tested separately and
test the product to EN 55022/24 (without radio, or with the 2.4
In my interpretation, the main product is not an ancillary equipment from EN
301 489-1 point of view. The main function has nothing to do with radio. The
product uses data from the internet and process it into any display. The Wifi,
is now an add on so you can also get the information wireless.
9 matches
Mail list logo