All,I am trying to locate a particular high voltage insulating grease or gel. I am unable to identify the manufacturer and type. The only description I can give at this point is the appearance which is green in color with an iridescent sheen. It looks much like automotive antifreeze fluid onl
In another life I tried the 60cm absorber for the S-VSWR test and had major
problems around 1-2GHz, in the end they were replaced with larger absorber. The
issue was the ground and ceiling reflection between the two antennas wasn’t
being properly attenuated by the smaller cones (looking back it
We purchased our absorber material many years ago now, so things maybe
different than it was then.
We were told that the absorber material most labs were using for 61000-4-3
testing above 1Ghz was “Too Tall” to be used for S-VSWR verification. So we
worked with TDK who recommended a shorter abs
Dear Members,
Does anyone have an experience using the same type/model of the absorbers
to meet both S-VSWR and 61000-4-3 field uniformity requirements? I was
told different type/model of the absorbers must be used. Is this true?
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Grace Lin
-
I never said they did not need to be compliant. That wasn't the question or was
it?
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 2:03 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE Marking on Packaging of Assembly Compone
In message <119fa9545c6e264b830c4582886d1190c534d...@quimby.dw.local>,
dated Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Mark Schmidt
writes:
In regard to your statement "Another package may include plastic panels
with no inherent standalone function" In this case there are no
harmonized standards that I am aware of
Carl
Personally, I would:
- Decide what is the most major part of the product which has a visible
external surface which be carrying all the other product identification
marking, and then put the CE marking on that part;
- Make sure that the product documentation going to the customers clearly
s
Carl,
In regard to your statement "Another package may include plastic panels with no
inherent standalone function" In this case there are no harmonized standards
that I am aware of for plastics so I will further assume that no CE Mark is
required.
Mark Schmidt
-Original Message-
From
I can across this European Commission document on spare parts this week. It
maybe of interest.
I believe it states that for EMC Directive OEM parts do not require a DoC ergo
no CE mark.
Google "APPLICATION OF EMC DIRECTIVE AND/OR EMC VEHICLE DIRECTIVE TO
AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT"
http://www.googl
It depends on which directives apply to the product/components. The Machinery
Direct is clear that partly complete machinery is not to carry a CE mark to
avoid confusion when it's integrated with the complete system. Partly
completed machinery should be accompanied by a DoI.However if your
In message , dated Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Carl
Newton writes:
The UK distributor has asked that all packages have the CE Marking on
the box. I'm reluctant to sign-up to this procedure in view of the
fact that the CE Marking should not be applied to most sub-assemblies.
I've reviewed the 2014
Group,
I'm dealing with a scenario in which a storage assembly that includes some
electronic functionality is assembled on-site by end-users. Various
elements of this storage product are shipped from different factories.
One package may include the electronic subassembly that has the prod
In message
lectric.com>, dated Wed, 26 Aug 2015, "McDiarmid, Ralph"
writes:
If I could download the entire October 2015 issue, it looks like it
would be > 100MB. I wonder if they split it into many, smaller chucks
for that reason, because their server has a relatively slow upload data
rate
13 matches
Mail list logo
