60950 (and 62368) rely on physical and behavioral
safeguards for safety. They have no provision for
relying on code (firmware or software) safeguards
for safety.
These standards require the equipment to be safe
in the event of a single fault. As I understand
the original comment, the RCD
The Military has a lot of fun toys. They also have the McKinley Climatic
Laboratory. It may be the largest temperature/humidity chamber around.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McKinley_Climatic_Laboratory
From: Ed Price [mailto:edpr...@cox.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 9:13 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@L
The US DoD has fairly deep pockets, as evidenced by the Benefield Test Chamber
at Edwards AFB. The Benefield chamber is about 250’ x 250’ x 70’ high. See:
http://www.edwards.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-141126-061.pdf
Ed Price
WB6WSN
Chula Vista, CA USA
-Original Message-
From
When I was at HP in Bristol, the financial issue was less of a problem than the
overhead structural steelwork, plus the stuff already either side, and a/c
ducting which limited the overall height and width - resulted in a chamber
which was nearly square in cross-section and that compromised the
I believe you are absolutely correct. :-)
Ghery S. Pettit
-Original Message-
From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen [mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl]
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 7:09 AM
To: Ghery S. Pettit; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Anechoic Chamber Questi
I think that before the practical limits come into play, financial
limits will stop the designed chamber from further growing.. ;<))
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen
Approvals manager
+ ce marking of electrical/e
6 matches
Mail list logo
