Thank you Rich. I will check if it is possible to check PE trace cross-section.
I also need to consider contact from PE trace to enclosure through pads on PCB
and screws.
Best regards,
Bostjan
-Original Message-
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016
> I also know this. However some labs are not in
favor to
> this statement.They interpret it in different
way like this
> is only applicable to internal components of
sub-
> assembly that is IEC 60950-1 or IEC 60065
certified. In
> addition, it is only allowed during transition
period.
As far as I
> During last TC 108 meeting there was no real
consensus
> about this topic. Also there was an issue raised
that fire
> enclosure of some product will fail requirement
of new
> standard while it was OK for IEC 60950-1 and
they will
> make a proposal to change the requirement in the
> standard.
Thi
Hi Boštjan:
> What is your view to this statement? How should
we fill
> the verdict in the test report in this case with
pass or
> N/A?
I would say the verdict is "pass." The basis is
the paragraph I quoted.
No matter the standard, the PE circuit must be
capable of carrying the fault current
Article 2 of 2015/863:
Article 2
1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by 31 December 2016 at the latest,
the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with
this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of
those provisions.
They sh
Actually, that NOTE is very much not permitted by IEC rules. A committee
cannot mandate a future requirement. There absolutely must be a vote of
National Committees at the time. The normal voting processes for a Edition 3
would be sufficient, but it would not be permissible to claim that Edition 3
I know this is not the RoHS forum, but I am having trouble with a simple
question and hope someone here can point me in the right direction. Have
not been able to get a clear reading from "RoHS" web sites.
We make ITE/AV equipment, category 3 and 4 in RoHS Directive Annex I.
At what date must our
Hi Rich,
I also know this. However some labs are not in favor to this statement.They
interpret it in different way like this is only applicable to internal
components of sub-assembly that is IEC 60950-1 or IEC 60065 certified. In
addition, it is only allowed during transition period.
During la
Hey, my mother programmed in BASIC. Show respect!
At the end of March, IEC told CENELEC that it wasn't happy about the copyright
status of ENs derived from IEC standards. However, IEC doesn't bother to
copyright translations into minority languages, so in future we can have
European standards o
Cervelat.
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England
We live in exiting times
-Original Message-
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 6:42 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@
Hi Boštjan:
Consider this IEC 62368-1, 4.1.1, paragraph:
"Components and subassemblies that comply with IEC
60950-1 or IEC 60065 are acceptable as part of
equipment covered by this standard without further
evaluation other than to give consideration to the
appropriate use of the component or sub
burritos in Geneva? You mean bratwurst?
-Original Message-
From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 1:32 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Electronic versions of standards and DRM
This was the general sentiment for the same
This was the general sentiment for the same discussion we previously had on
this, which was memorialized in EDN or ED (do not remember).
Am not certain that many standards are developed with public monies, as the
ANSI, ISO, and IEC are NGOs, so the EN/UL/CSA/etc adoption of a national
version o
Standards produced by tax-payer funded bodies should be free to citizens,
shouldn't they?
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England
We live in exiting times
-Original Message-
From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:
On 6/28/2016 10:59 AM, John Woodgate wrote:
ny standards publisher that makes it difficult to use their standards
qualifies for a Darwin Award. How stupid can you get? (We don't know,
we aren't extinct yet.)
Hmm... Can I expect C63 etc. free on the FCC site? No? What a shame...
Cortland Richm
Hello Dan,
IHS is an option.
https://global.ihs.com/
You have the option of buying an individual copy of a standard with a
single-copy limit or you can build a standards library that allows you to
purchase PDF copies of standards that can be shared across your organization.
It’s not the cheape
I buy whatever I can from https://www.evs.ee/shop , 2 licenses so PDF is not
locked and is allowed t be put on server.
I bought a PDF recently from NFPA and it was not locked, only watermarked.
On occasion I have scanned hardcopy to PDF, then run the OCR scanner on it to
make it searchable.
Fr
It depends very much on who publishes the standards. For example, many European
and IEC standards can be obtained from the Estonian Standards body in English
at attractive prices and a choice of means of delivery. https://www.evs.ee/shop
ITU and ETSI standards are downloadable and free.
Any s
All,The topic of where to buy standards comes up every once in a while on this list and usually is based on price or licensing type requirements. I understand that DRM is a necessary evil these days but I am looking for a vendor of standards that does not require that software be installed in orde
19 matches
Mail list logo
