Re: [PSES] Was there ever a comparison between IEC 60950-1 and IEC 62368-1 (current edition preferable)? And any rationale for any of the changes

2017-12-05 Thread IBM Ken
Hi Leo! ECMA released a Technical Report (TR-106) in February 2013, so be forewarned that it only compares IEC60950-1, 2nd ed (2005) to the *1st* (2010) edition of 62368-1. A significant number of clauses were moved or renumbered between 1st and 2nd edition (enough that it made it difficult to

Re: [PSES] Was there ever a comparison between IEC 60950-1 and IEC 62368-1 (current edition preferable)? And any rationale for any of the changes

2017-12-05 Thread Brian O'Connell
ECMA TR106, but was done for 1st ed only. Brian From: Leo Eisner [mailto:l...@eisnersafety.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 4:40 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Was there ever a comparison between IEC 60950-1 and IEC 62368-1 (current edition preferable)? And any

[PSES] Was there ever a comparison between IEC 60950-1 and IEC 62368-1 (current edition preferable)? And any rationale for any of the changes

2017-12-05 Thread Leo Eisner
I am in IEC SC62A (60601-1 series of standards - Medical electrical equipment & systems) meetings this week and we are trying to id the differences between these 2 standards so we can figure out how to integrate IEC 62368-1 into IEC 60601-1, 3rd ed. + A2, if we have the time and agreement with