Hello,
according to EN55032/CISPR32, the port you describe is not a wired network
port (sec.3.1.32), rather a signal/control port. (sec.3.1.30).
In Annex A of the standard I don't see tests required on such a port.
Best regards,
Paolo
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:18 PM, itl-emc user group
wrote:
By 'troublesome' I meant 'emissions over, or too close to, the limit,
that can't be easily reduced.' If the emissions are low enough or can be
made so, why bother to ask about need to test?
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 20
EMC testing is like speeding by car. Did you ever try convince an
officer that you drove too fast for only a few minutes by year if caught
over-speeding? And what did he say ?
Ports do not need testing only if inoperable at all. And even than, from
a technical point of view it may generate in
David
It is for the manufacturer to determine applicable ports for the lab to test
8 Applicability
Measurements shall be performed on the relevant ports of the EUT according to
the appropriate tables given in Annex A.
Where a manufacturer determines from the electrical characteristics and
inten
Do you even need to justify not testing,if it doesn't produces
troublesome emissions? The only justification I can see might be that it
is used only for periods of a few minutes a few times a year.
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex
A device has a wired network port used for de-bugging only.
The port is not used during normal operation of the device.
Any opinions on whether or not this port should be tested?
Regards,
David Shidlowsky | Technical Reviewer
Address 1 Bat-Sheva St. LOD 7120101 Israel
Tel 972-8-9186113 Fax 972-8-
6 matches
Mail list logo
