Re: [PSES] Pearson RF Current Probe

2019-08-20 Thread Ken Javor
I have a Pearson Model 2877 and used it on a project where the electric field was quite strong and the current very minute, so I needed much more electric field shielding than afforded by the typical current probe design. This was after copper taping a conventional current probe (1.25² window diame

Re: [PSES] Pearson RF Current Probe

2019-08-20 Thread Doug Powell
Do you need the same maximum current and frequency range? I've used the Pearson 101, 110 and Pearson 411 in the past, mainly because of the 3 dB low-frequency cutoff and the very flat phase / frequency response within the band pass. However, sensitivity is different by a couple orders. It will be

[PSES] Pearson RF Current Probe

2019-08-20 Thread Jones, Richard
Anybody know of an equivalent to a Pearson 2877? Rich - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are arc