Clause 2 under the definition for “acceptable” can only be used under specific
conditions, specifically if no NRTL has the capability to test and certify the
equipment. In such cases, the equipment/installation would be acceptable to
OSHA if a state/federal agency determined it was safe. The r
Hi Regan:
Yes, if that piece of equipment is not within any NRTL purview.
Best regards,
Rich
From: Regan Arndt
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 1:22 PM
To: Richard Nute
Cc: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [PSES] Mandatory certification
Hi Rich.
If you are
Hi Rich.
If you are referring to clause (2):
*(2) With respect to an installation or equipment of a kind that no
nationally recognized testing laboratory accepts, certifies, lists, labels,
or determines to be safe, if it is inspected or tested by another Federal
agency, or by a State, municipal,
Having worked for an NRTL in the past and with a few manufacturers, I can
attest to Dave’s comment. Generally, the manufacturer is responsible for the
field inspection of the equipment. Several of the major NRTL’s in the US have
a program in place for this process.
Josh
Joshua Wiseman
System
Or typically the government organization, the AHJ, simply accepts the field
inspection label applied by NRTL or other recognized entity. The
owner/operator of the product is ultimately responsible for the
inspection. I’ve never known a government organization to hire a NRTL for
field inspection,
Hi Regan:
While field inspection is not part of OSHA's NRTL program, OSHA rules allow
another government (federal, state, local) organization to determine compliance
with the NEC. See:
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.399
I would guess that such
6 matches
Mail list logo
