Re: [PSES] IEC 62368-1: To understand chapter 5.4.11

2024-05-09 Thread Bill Owsley
I have been watching this subject for a while. i vaguely recall that in some front matter in some standards is a statement that indicates that this is the minimum requirements to go to market. So in the interests of the Corp/s that I worked for at the time, and any quality targets, that they

Re: [PSES] IEC 62368-1: To understand chapter 5.4.11

2024-05-09 Thread Piotr Galka
Hi James, Thank you for drawing attention to this but my sentence was in context of 62368-1 only. When in 2004 (few days after we joined EU) I went with my devices for the first time to EMC lab (it was an internal company laboratory that also offered external services) they didn't had a

Re: [PSES] IEC 62368-1: To understand chapter 5.4.11

2024-05-09 Thread James Pawson (U3C)
Hi Piotr, Just to add to the debate: “I know that if circuit is not going out of building it is considered being without transients” If a cable is longer than 30m then most product EMC standards will call up a requirement for line-to-earth surge testing. Some do make it explicit that

Re: [PSES] IEC 62368-1: To understand chapter 5.4.11

2024-05-09 Thread Piotr Galka
Hi Ralph and John, 62368-1 I have bought from PKN is in form "first and last page Polish and everything inside English". I suppose they with pleasure will charge me for 62368-2 if I ask them for it. The only question is how much time is needed to prepare these 2 pages. As I remember from