[PSES] FW: [PSES] EU sets EMC limits for London Olympics

2012-08-10 Thread Andrew McCallum
From: Andrew McCallum Sent: 09 August 2012 09:12 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] EU sets EMC limits for London Olympics For a very small Licence fee the BBC provide TV, Radio and internet services which dominate the market. Compared to the costs of Sky and Virgin media its

Re: [PSES] Interview Questions

2012-07-05 Thread Andrew McCallum
Questions It's safer! :-P :-D On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Scott Xe scott...@gmail.commailto:scott...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Andy, Is there any particular reasons to have 110 Vac for railway signalling system in a 230/240 Vac country? Scott On 4/7/12 3:10 PM, Andrew McCallum andrew.mccal

Re: [PSES] Interview Questions

2012-07-04 Thread Andrew McCallum
The UK railway signalling system all runs at 110 V AC 50 HZ Andy -Original Message- From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: 03 July 2012 21:17 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: Interview Questions In message

[PSES] Power Supplies

2012-06-01 Thread Andrew McCallum
in the cabinets under fault conditions. Supply would be 110V AC to each system from different phases of the building 3 Phase supply. Regards Andrew McCallum Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the addressees only (or people authorised to receive them on their behalf

FCC Part 15.109 and 15.209 Radiated emission limits

2009-01-07 Thread Andrew McCallum
Happy new year all Can anyone explain why an unintentional radiator is allowed to have higher emission limits than an intentional radiator. By design you would hope that spurious emissions from an intentional radiator would be lower but why have two different limits? Any help much

[Bulk] Re: 42 55GHz radio test lab

2009-01-05 Thread Andrew McCallum
http://www.tuv-uk.com/english/30400.htm Have only tested up to 6GHz but TUV where the only test house I could find to do the work. May be work talking to them. Andy T.Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp 25/12/2008 11:06 I have a client who wish to sell their radio product (42GHz and/or 55GHz band

FCC Part 15.103

2008-11-28 Thread Andrew McCallum
Hi FCC part 15.103 exempts digital devices from testing if they are on any transportation vehicle, but only mentions air and road vehicles - not rail which is were my system will be deployed. It also says any test equipment in an industrial system is exempt. Does test equipment cover

Happy Thanksgiving

2008-11-28 Thread Andrew McCallum
Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the addressees only (or people authorised to receive them on their behalf) and may be confidential or privileged. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone;

RE: FCC

2008-09-23 Thread Andrew McCallum
Office: 631-738-5134 Mobile: 63 1-827-9385 Fax: 631-738-3776 e-mail: mark.luks...@motorola.com -Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Andrew

FCC

2008-09-19 Thread Andrew McCallum
If you connect an FCC approved modem and antenna (gain within the grant of the modem) to a system which is fully compliant to the standards required in its intended environment would you have to carry out further testing on the whole system to claim FCC compliance for the system or would it be

FCC Requirement Note

2008-09-15 Thread Andrew McCallum
Thanks for the comments so far. From what I can gather from the responses I really need to have a copy of the FCC Grant note. Have searched Google and FCC site but can not find the document. Are Grants published anywhere? FCC ID AU792U07A31817 regards Andy

Re: FCC Requirement Note

2008-09-15 Thread Andrew McCallum
Thanks everyone I have found what I need. Regards Andy Andrew McCallum andrew.mccal...@deltarail.com 15/09/2008 10:19 Thanks for the comments so far. From what I can gather from the responses I really need to have a copy of the FCC Grant note. Have searched Google and FCC site but can

FCC Requirement Note

2008-09-12 Thread Andrew McCallum
Been given the note below but need to find the original source for reference can anyone help please? FCC Requirements Note: The antenna gain, including cable loss, must not exceed 3.0 dBi at 1900 MHz / 1.6 dBi at 850 M0Hz for mobile operating configurations and 7.0 dBi at 1900 MHz / 2.3 dBi at

EMC in the news: RFID Medical

2008-06-25 Thread Andrew McCallum
Be interesting to see exactly what they tested. Was the medical equipment built to the current Medical Equipment Directive or not. What frequencies did the RFID equipment work on. Was it the reader or the tag that was 10cm away from the affected equipment. Need to see the full report Regards

FCC Immunity Requirements

2008-05-02 Thread Andrew McCallum
This message has been converted via the evaluation version of Transend Migrator. Use beyond the trial period specified in your Software Evaluation Agreement is prohibited. Please contact Transend Corporation at (650) 324-5370 or sales.i...@transend.com to obtain a license suitable for use in a

Re: FCC Immunity Requirements

2008-05-02 Thread Andrew McCallum
is the rate-of-increase of such postings? One would come to the conclusion that either the state of California is much smarter than the rest of the forty-nine states, or that CA is a very unhealthy place to live. Ken Javor Phone: (256) 650-5261 From: Andrew McCallum