From: Andrew McCallum
Sent: 09 August 2012 09:12
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EU sets EMC limits for London Olympics
For a very small Licence fee the BBC provide TV, Radio and internet services
which dominate the market. Compared to the costs of Sky and Virgin media its
Questions
It's safer! :-P :-D
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Scott Xe
scott...@gmail.commailto:scott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andy,
Is there any particular reasons to have 110 Vac for railway signalling
system in a 230/240 Vac country?
Scott
On 4/7/12 3:10 PM, Andrew McCallum
andrew.mccal
The UK railway signalling system all runs at 110 V AC 50 HZ
Andy
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 03 July 2012 21:17
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: Interview Questions
In message
in the cabinets under fault
conditions. Supply would be 110V AC to each system from different phases of the
building 3 Phase supply.
Regards
Andrew McCallum
Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the
addressees only (or people authorised to receive them on their behalf
Happy new year all
Can anyone explain why an unintentional radiator is allowed to have higher
emission limits than an intentional radiator. By design you would hope that
spurious emissions from an intentional radiator would be lower but why have
two different limits?
Any help much
http://www.tuv-uk.com/english/30400.htm
Have only tested up to 6GHz but TUV where the only test house I could find to
do the work.
May be work talking to them.
Andy
T.Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp 25/12/2008 11:06
I have a client who wish to sell their radio product
(42GHz and/or 55GHz band
Hi
FCC part 15.103 exempts digital devices from testing if they are on any
transportation vehicle, but only mentions air and road vehicles - not rail
which is were my system will be deployed.
It also says any test equipment in an industrial system is exempt.
Does test equipment cover
Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the
addressees only (or people authorised to receive them on their behalf) and may
be confidential or privileged. If they have come to you in error you must take
no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone;
Office: 631-738-5134
Mobile: 63 1-827-9385
Fax: 631-738-3776
e-mail: mark.luks...@motorola.com
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Andrew
If you connect an FCC approved modem and antenna (gain within the grant of the
modem) to a system which is fully compliant to the standards required in its
intended environment would you have to carry out further testing on the whole
system to claim FCC compliance for the system or would it be
Thanks for the comments so far. From what I can gather from the responses I
really need to have a copy of the FCC Grant note. Have searched Google and FCC
site but can not find the document. Are Grants published anywhere?
FCC ID AU792U07A31817
regards
Andy
Thanks everyone I have found what I need.
Regards
Andy
Andrew McCallum andrew.mccal...@deltarail.com 15/09/2008 10:19
Thanks for the comments so far. From what I can gather from the responses I
really need to have a copy of the FCC Grant note. Have searched Google and FCC
site but can
Been given the note below but need to find the original source for reference
can anyone help please?
FCC Requirements Note:
The antenna gain, including cable loss, must not exceed 3.0 dBi at 1900 MHz /
1.6 dBi at
850 M0Hz for mobile operating configurations and 7.0 dBi at 1900 MHz / 2.3 dBi
at
Be interesting to see exactly what they tested.
Was the medical equipment built to the current Medical Equipment Directive or
not.
What frequencies did the RFID equipment work on.
Was it the reader or the tag that was 10cm away from the affected equipment.
Need to see the full report
Regards
This message has been converted via the evaluation version of
Transend Migrator. Use beyond the trial period specified in
your Software Evaluation Agreement is prohibited. Please contact
Transend Corporation at (650) 324-5370 or sales.i...@transend.com
to obtain a license suitable for use in a
is the rate-of-increase of such postings? One would come to the conclusion
that either the state of California is much smarter than the rest of the
forty-nine states, or that CA is a very unhealthy place to live.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Andrew McCallum
16 matches
Mail list logo