C63 has a seminar on EMC Measurement Uncertainty. Contact D. N. Heirman at
d.heir...@worldnet.att.net. I participate in that seminar. I also have a
two-day course on EMC Measurement Uncertainty that I have given.
Regards, EdB
-Original Message-
From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:hulbe...@pb.
Paul, the DSSS version of the document was published as Appendix C to the
original final rule-making in FCC ET Docket 96-8. EdB
-Original Message-
From: Paul Slavens [mailto:paul_slav...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 4:22 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: DSSS document
Hello Chris Maxwell,
I have seen these things at several IEEE/Zurich EMC Symposia. I have
listened to the sales people tell me how it works and how well it works, but
I have to admit I have always been a skeptic. I have used various TEM
devices in the past, mostly with good success. I have use
Mr. Martin, have you thought about the fact that the near-field probe does
not integrate the whole radiation sphere from your product? On the 10 m
site, your antenna sees radiation components from all parts of the EUT,
including any cables; while your near-field probe in the lab cannot pick all
o
remains 3 V/m.
Regards, EdB
-Original Message-
From: Gary McInturff [mailto:gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 4:47 PM
To: Bronaugh, Edwin; ''emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org' '
Subject: RE: Immunity Testing to EN55024
Are you sure
Darrell, yes, I have, but my solution is not to use such a vendor again.
There are vendors for cables out there who know how to do the job correctly;
and always do it that way! EdB
-Original Message-
From: Darrell Locke (msmail) [mailto:dlo...@advanced-input.com]
Sent: Wednesday, Septem
It remains 3 V/m. However, the peak envelop power is 5.1 dB higher than the
unmodulated carrier level. If you set a signal generator to produce an
unmodulated carrier (usually through an amplifier) of 3 V/m and then
modulate it 80 %, the generator will still show the same carrier level, but
the
7 matches
Mail list logo
