I got the following information from
http://world.std.com/~inchcape/saso.html
***
The Saudi Arabian Standards Organization (SASO) has
announced the commencement of an International Conformity
Certification Program (ICCP) and appointed Inchcape Testing
Services as
Retransmission of mid-July message, which didn't seem to
get through:
--
It's Friday afternoon (well, it is where I am), and it's
been a hard week, so I thought I would bring some levity
into these hallowed halls!
Does anybody know of alternative definitions for EMC and C
For shielded windows you could try:
RFI Shielding Ltd.,
Warner Drive,
Springwood Ind. Est.
Rayne Road,
Braintree,
Essex CM7 7YW
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)1376-342626
Fax: +44 (0)1376-346442
--
Chomerics Ltd.
Unit 8, First Avenue,
Globe Park Ind. Est.
Marlow,
It's Friday afternoon (well, it is where I am), and it's
been a hard week, so I thought I would bring some levity
into these hallowed halls!
Does anybody know of alternative definitions for EMC and
CE? The one's I have so far are:
Even More Confusion
End of My Career
Exclusively Male Club
Easy Mo
G'day!
Mark Briggs wrote:
> The DoC and Technical File (NOT to be confused with a
> Tecnical Construction File) should be available to the
> authorities upon request,
To my knowledge, the only technical file associated with the
EU EMC Directive _is_ the "Technical Construction File", and
this i
G'day!
Mark Briggs wrote:
> The DoC and Technical File (NOT to be confused with a Tecnical Construction
> File) should be available to the authorities upon request,
To my knowledge, the only technical file associated with
the EU EMC Directive _is_ the "Technical Construction
File", and this is
> Francie Miller wrote:
> I am seeking information pertaining to non-CE marked
> equipment to be used by European military groups. If
> anyone has country specific information or experience,
> that would be most appreciated.
>
By "non-CE marked equipment" and "European military groups"
I assu
Nick is quite correct, as usual.
The first revision of:
The GUIDELINES ON THE APPLICATION OF COUNCIL
DIRECTIVE 89/336/EEC OF 3 MAY 1989 ON THE APPROXIMATION OF THE LAWS OF THE
MEMBER STATES RELATING TO ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY
has been issued.
I got mine (in the UK), dated 12 April 96, fro
There's been past discussions on the point that a
collection of EMC compliant bits do not (necessarily) make
for a compliant system. There's even guidelines on the fact
that if you add a board (EMC CE-marked or not) to a
compliant PC, you should still test the PC+board for
continued compliance.
Qu
Judging from the mail I received on my "Excluded
Installations?" message, some things have become clear(er):
1) One Competent Body's opinion is not anothers - some said
a collection of compliant parts made a compliant system and
could be regarded as an excluded installation; and some said
it didn'
To re-visit a previous theme "what is an excluded
installation":
1a. The UK Statutory Instrument, clause 13, answers this
with (paraphrased) "two or more items or systems put
together at a given place to fulfil a specific objective but
not designed by the manufacturer(s) for supply as a single
uni
G'day! A little thought ocurred on a late Friday
afternoon:-
The UK implementation of the EMC directive distinguishes
between equipment "supplied" and "taken into service".
The UKs DTI have indicated that equipment is "taken into
service" and not "supplied" if it is made to the
specification o
Recently Ron Wellman wrote:
> I believe that everyone contributing to this thread knows that zapping
> pins of exposed connector pins is almost always a guaranteed failure.
> Whether you fix it or not is a business decision,
>From a European point of view, I would have thought that
if the
13 matches
Mail list logo
