Hi all,
   Can anyone share with me under what conditions an auditor is allowed to
stop shipments ?

   Thanks,alice
---------------------- Forwarded by Lay Siang Saw/MY/Asia/Celestica on
02/18/2003 06:09 PM ---------------------------


Lay Siang Saw
02/18/2003 10:50 AM

To:    emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
cc:

Subject:    product safety audit scenario

Hi all,
   Thank you very much for your comments.I have received many replies from
this forum.
   May be someone out there can standardize this,applicable to UL,TUV,CSA
etc.

   On the report                                On the physical part
VN ?
.......................................
.......................................
.....................................................................
 1. Rating (V)  90-135/180-265V            115/230V               NO,as
this part has been tested in 90-135/180-265V range
 2. Rating (I)  12/10A                                  10A
NO,as this  rating is within the tested rating
 3. Rating (V)  120-127/220-240V           125/230V              NO,as this
part has been tested in 120-127/220-240V range
 4. Rating (V) 120-127/220-240V             120-127V              NO,the
rating used within the tested range


 Once again ,thank you all  and  it would be good if there is
standardisation made on this issue.


 Regards,alice


---------------------- Forwarded by Lay Siang Saw/MY/Asia/Celestica on
02/18/2003 10:51 AM ---------------------------


Lay Siang Saw
02/17/2003 11:40 AM

To:    emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
cc:

Subject:    product safety audit scenario

Hi all,can anyone share with me with your comments....
Scenario : Component A with rating mentioned in the UL's product report as
90-135/180-265 Vac, however in the phyical unit is written as 115/230 V .
Q1 : Is this a non conformity ? Should a VN be raised ?50 % says Yes and
other 50% says No

Scenario :In the report, it mentioned the marking on the label as 120-127V
, however in the actual label on the unit it is written as
120-127V/220-240V.
Q2. Is this a non conformity ? Should a VN be raised ?100% yes

Scenario : In the report, it mentioned component B carries many safety
agency certification, however i the actual physical unit, it only containes
one or two safety agency logos.
Q3. Is this a non conformity ? Should a VN be raised ? 90% says YES and 10%
says NO


Q4. When an IPI ( Initial product inspection ) is carried out, should the
UL's product report been approved by the UL ?
Q5. Should the report used during IPI is a detailed report with Sec general
and condition of testing been included ?
Q6. Can anyone share with me the correct ways the product report/FUS
procedure for a product should be written
so that we are not caught up with it, particularly on the rating,model and
safety agency certification requirement for the product ?

I am looking forwards to hearing a reply from you.
Thanks
Regards,
alice saw









This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Dave Heald:               davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to