Hi all!
I need to contact a EMC test lab in the Vancouver, BC or Seattle, WA area to do
a field emissions test in Vancouver.
Does anyone have any recommendations or references to a lab(s) in that area
that have the capability to do this?
Best regards,
Terry J. Meck
Senior Compliance/Test Engi
I have also been down this road.
We insist he supply manufacturer add the new version to their `recognized'
file. If it doesn't affect the critical components transformer etc. it should
be a minor update to their file.
This way you have a recognized component that is traceable.
If it isn't s
Rich:
The reason Zenith was using the `hand wired' promo was the `cold' and
overheated PC boards especially the tube sockets that unsoldered themselves or
when the trace separated from the board. This takes me back to the creapage
point. I remember cutting away base board material, actually
Rich:
My resolution when we go that far back is +/- 5 years minimum :-) :-)
I don't recall the Sony but do recall the Philco and that Zenith held out with
the `hand wired' chassis.
Terry
>>> Rich Nute 08/02/01 12:38PM >>>
> >I saw the first PCB show up in TVs,
>
> Would you care to
Group:
Check my interpretation of EN 61000-6-2:1999 Immunity DC power Port Table 3
Note 3. This is with reference to an industrial application with a DC power
input.
Intended to be either supplied with an AC-DC power supply (`power adapter') or
a distributed DC power from a distant AC-DC sour
You can't change the facts. So yes! In the Middle to late 50's. :-)
>>> John Woodgate 08/01/01 03:16PM >>>
, Terry Meck inimitably
wrote:
>I saw the first PCB show up in TVs,
Would you care to put a date on that?
--
Regards, John Woodgate
Rich:
As always I appreciated your eloquent explanation of the concept of the
creapage requirement. Unfortunately experience has taught me long before your
email.
My question was based on the fact the standard does not SEEM to address the
larger creapage distance >1000 volts. My reasoning c
Hi Rich:
I thought the lack of creapage spec. at >1000 V is that the dielectric strength
of air would be less then the insulating material and surface accumulated
contaminates. As a result the clearance distance would be the first to break
down >1000 Volts.
Am I wrong?
Best regards,
Terry
Hello all,
Is there any new requirement on doing conducted emissions testing on
distributed DC inside a building.
RE: EN 55022:1998
The DC comes from an AC - DC supply (compliant).
Would there be a cable length above which the conducted test must be done?
I know some immunity tests are required
Greetings,
We are in need of safety guidance in the final design of and the specifying
parts for an electronic ballast to be used in an ITE product. UL / EN 60950.
I have guided many products through UL Listing using recognized parts and
supplies. But I don't have the time for any oversights
Hello again:
Does anyone recall if there were any standard called for or ESD generator that
simulated as the case may be => +-10 kV CONTACT discharge.
We have a customer that is specifying passing +-16 kV ESD without referring to
AIR or Contact discharge. I am inclined to ask what they have
When updating a declaration, as in this case, what is the accepted practice
create a new Declaration with the additional standards referenced or amending
the previous one.
I have always created a new one. Is there any argument for one over the
other?
Terry J. Meck
Accu-Sort Systems Inc.
>>
Hi All:
As long as your on this discussion I would like to know if this has been
harmonized to the degree that IEC 950 has?
I suspect the answer is no.
Thanks!
Terry
>>> "O'Shaughnessy, Paul" 04/05/01 01:57PM
>>> >>>
The opening paragraph of the Scope of 1010-1 states it covers "electrical
Thank you all for your input and tolerating the rantings of an old man (my kids
don't like when I say that).
Rich:
As usual you hit the nail on the head.
We have a tendency to rationalize when the spirit of the standard is complied
with but the hard proof of compliance is some what vague and t
gt; of engineering judgment might help resolve the situation.
>
>
> My opinion only and not that of my employer.
>
> Good Luck.
> Regards,
> Kaz Gawrzyjal
> kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com
Hi group!
I need a sanity check on a `new approach' our safety agency has recently taken.
We have an open frame power supply ( has all the certs through the CB report
etc. for EN 60950 UL 1950 )
On of the conditions of acceptability is one mounting standoff shall be
insulated. We have this s
If I read the EN 61000-6-2 correctly Table 2.3 indicates signal ports => 30 M
must be tested +/- 1000 surge " unless normal functioning cannot be maintained
because of the impact of the CDN on the EUT"
This surprises and confuses me since I thought this would be imposed only on
cables leavi
I would like to bounce something off the group.
What are the complications of self-declaration without an independent test lab
being involved?
Very Simply said the way I understand it:
1. You need calibrated test equipment and facilities to do the tests required
for your product.
1.1. Except
High all:
I have been away form the forum, very busy, and a quick review notes you have
been discussing Power distribution in USA.
What about Europe? We have an application needing 480 VAC here in USA.
How compatible will 480 VAC be in Europe?
Someone told me 390 VAC is more real in Europe.
Hello:
I have a question about the interpretation of UL 1950 / En 60950 sec 4.4.6
Fire enclosure construction.
"The following constructions are considered to satisfy the requirement without
test:
openings in the bottom, each not larger than 40 mm sq under: @
components of
I have chosen to test and document the max power consumption or our products.
We have the power analyzer and AC source to document this. However, if you
have clear power consumption documentation form in house tests that you can
provide showing =< 75 W this should satisfy the requirement as I s
" I read this as what it says. That to me excludes systems
connected to the "public electricity supply system " and computers isolated
from the public system unless it has a significant influence on that system
somehow. (the quantity, thousands vs hundreds in use for example).
There are a number of labs The List of Approved EMC Designated Laboratories is
at : http://www.bsmi.gov.tw/english/emc/e_emc_09.htm
We use:
Unisys PCTC Unisys Product ComplianceTest Center,
2476 Swedesford Rd.
Malvern, PA 19355
USA
Contact: Daniel J Mis,
daniel@unisys.com
Best regards,
Ter
Hi again:
In the course of a design review the option of invoking a D3 deviation came up.
Since we usually ship to the EU I have never allowed D3 deviations.
The question came to mind that I thought the D3 deviations expired this year.
Is this a foggy memory from UL 1950 2nd edition 1993 Suppl
Hello all:
We are reviewing the probability of purchasing a surge generator to do in house
compliance testing to the EN 61000-4-5 standard plus up to 6KV for some
customer specific requirements.
We have quotes from most of the major players and the equipment ranges from
very basic cost effect
V
RF conducted immunity tests. (EN 61000-4-4, -4-6 etc.)
Do they fold under those levels?
I always protect them when using them as support equipment. Am I over cautious?
Regards,
Terry Meck
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product S
Hello:
Who knows what the correlation is between UL 1950 and "DIN EN 60950
(VDE 0805)" ?
Can it be said that when CB deviations are considered both standards
are covered?
I am also looking for a description of:
DIN EN/IEC 60721-3-3 class combination IE33
DIN EN/IEC 60721-3-2 class combination
Hello again,
Does anyone in this forum have any knowledge about United States FDA 21 CFR
part 11 certification.
What is the process?
Are there independent labs that test or witness test software?
I have been asked these questions and have no experience in this direction.
This may not be the f
Hi:
It seems our people are having trouble finding a dual output NEC Class 2 or
ITE LPS rated +12 VDC .5 A +5 VDC .5A desk top Power supply.
They keep coming to me with Class II insulation systems and some Data sheets
say Class 2 insulation systems.
Any suggestions on who has such a supply o
Hi again!
Are there any major changes between EN 61000-6-2:2001 vs EN 61000-6-2:1999
which has a Date of cessation of 01.07.2004.
I am in the process of ordering it but am too impatient to wait on the
delivery :-)
Best regards,
Terry J. Meck
Senior Compliance Engineer
tjm...@accusort.com
Hi:
We have been using an old reliable but very busy Safety agency to
review our products and apply their safety mark.
>From time to time we are approached by their competitors, NRTLs, or
European soon to be NRTL labs for our business.
My question is in this `NRTL enlightened market are there s
Hello all:
I n my checking a filter material spec our, `less then knowledgeable'
contact, supplier referred to a Flammability rating of `Class 2 28H2'.
Does anyone know what this spec may be.
Obviously I am also `less then knowledgeable' on this subject. What I
needed was a reference to the
tp://www.advanced-energy.com
===
-Original Message-
From: Terry Meck [mailto:tjm...@accusort.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 8:47 AM
To: nsh...@nortelnetworks.com
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: new legal issues re: Bar Code
Naftali:
I understand there is a laws
Naftali:
I understand there is a lawsuit pending see news release below.
BAR CODE VENDORS TEAM UP TO TAKE ON LEMELSON FOUNDATION
New York
Seven automatic identification companies have joined forces and filed
suit in federal court to invalidate bar code patents held by late
inventor Jerome Le
34 matches
Mail list logo