Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-03-02 Thread Scott Xe
device sending pulses to TV receiver for intended function. Thanks and regards, Scott From: Michael Derby Reply-To: Michael Derby Date: Thursday, 2 March 2017 at 4:27 AM To: Subject: Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED I was planning to ‘plead the fifth’ on any

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-03-01 Thread Michael Derby
directive or another. Thanks, Michael. From: Michael Derby [mailto:micha...@acbcert.com] Sent: 01 March 2017 18:03 To: 'msherma...@comcast.net' ; 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG' Subject: RE: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED Hello, Here are my tho

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-03-01 Thread Michael Derby
: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED Seems to me that IR does not communicate in the radio frequency range, but BT and RF do, so I would say IR is out of RED scope but BT and RF are within scope. What opinions do others have? Mike Sherman Graco Inc. _ From: "Sco

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-03-01 Thread Nick Williams
-- > [mailto:msherma...@comcast.net <mailto:msherma...@comcast.net>] > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 9:52 AM > To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> > Subject: Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED > > Seems to me that IR does n

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-03-01 Thread Sundstrom, Mike
s but nobody knows why." -- Albert Einstein From: Mike Sherman - Original Message - [mailto:msherma...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 9:52 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED Seems to me that IR does not communicate in

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-03-01 Thread Mike Sherman ----- Original Message -----
MC-PSTC" Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 8:21:14 AM Subject: Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED For the traditional TV that comes with an infrared remote controller and latest TV that comes with BT or RF remote controller, does it fall into RED scope? Thanks, Scott F

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-03-01 Thread Scott Xe
areas). Is there any additional standard for this part? Regards, Scott From: Michael Derby Date: Tuesday, 21 February 2017 at 12:05 AM To: 'Scott Xe' , Subject: RE: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED Hi Scott, Please don’t forget that for FM Radio Rece

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-02-20 Thread Scott Xe
additional standard for this part? Regards, Scott From: Michael Derby Date: Tuesday, 21 February 2017 at 12:05 AM To: 'Scott Xe' , Subject: RE: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED Hi Scott, Please don’t forget that for FM Radio Receivers, the Article 3.2 standar

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-02-20 Thread Michael Derby
because some of the standards (such as EN 303 340) are already listed on the RED OJ. Thanks, Michael. From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 February 2017 23:00 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED For TV/Radio receivers

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-02-20 Thread Charlie Blackham
ts that. Thanks, Michael. -Original Message- From: Nick Williams [mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk<mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk>] Sent: 04 January 2017 12:18 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: [PSES] Conformity assessme

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-02-20 Thread Scott Xe
**www.sulisconsultants.com* > <https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f> > > Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 > > > > *From:* Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* 19 F

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-02-19 Thread Scott Xe
- From: Nick Williams [mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk] Sent: 04 January 2017 12:18 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED Happy New Year, EMC-PSTC listers! 2014/15/EU article 17 separates the conformity assessment procedures for essential

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-02-17 Thread Dave Heald
at. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Michael. >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Nick Williams [mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk] >> Sent: 04 January 2017 12:18 >> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG >> Subject: [PSES] Confor

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-02-17 Thread Dave Heald
1999/5/EC, but it was not correctly > or clearly written. 2014/53/EU corrects that. > > Thanks, > > Michael. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Nick Williams [mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk] > Sent: 04 January 2017 12:18 > To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.OR

Re: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-01-04 Thread Michael Derby
corrects that. Thanks, Michael. -Original Message- From: Nick Williams [mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk] Sent: 04 January 2017 12:18 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Conformity assessment under RED Happy New Year, EMC-PSTC listers! 2014/15/EU article 17 separates

[PSES] Conformity assessment under RED

2017-01-04 Thread Nick Williams
Happy New Year, EMC-PSTC listers! 2014/15/EU article 17 separates the conformity assessment procedures for essential requirement 3.1 (safety and EMC) from those which are applied for essential requirements 3.2 and 3.3 (spectrum efficiency and special provisions). Notified Body intervention is r