Has anyone experienced having an ITE product that complies with IEC60950
requirements, but does not comply with some portions IEC 62368? In particular
the use of a non-LPS psu. Is there some sort of risk analysis that can be done
to prove up conformance to the directive based on 60950 with or
2020 7:57 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Demonstrating Compliance to the LVD w/o using 62368
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Has anyone experienced having an ITE product that complies with IEC60950
requirements, but does not comply with some portions IEC 62368? In particular
the use of a no
TC 108.
From: Chuck August-McDowell
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 11:33 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] Demonstrating Compliance to the LVD w/o using
62368
Hi Charles,
Only slightly off your topic "Has anyone experienced having an ITE product that
co
Ted, John, Chuck
Thank you the feedback. Much appreciated.
From: Ted Eckert <07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 12:57 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Demonstrating Compliance to the LVD w/o using 62368
External emai
<07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 9:56 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Demonstrating Compliance to the LVD w/o using 62368
Caution: This email message originated from outside of the organization. DO NOT
CLICK on li
by
> IEC 62368-1 2nd edition. Many issues were resolved with the update.
>
>
>
> Ted Eckert
>
> Microsoft Corporation
>
>
>
> The opinions experessed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of
> my employer or TC 108.
>
>
>
>
>
>
&g
f6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org<mailto:07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org>>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 9:56 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Demonstrating C
7 matches
Mail list logo
