Anyone aware of what seems as a typo to me
in EN 60950-1:2006 in par 5.3.4
it say that clearance and creepage distances for functional isolation
must be respected for INaccessible parts ...
Whats the sense of guarding the isolation to not accessible parts
At the same time,
consequence of its use.
From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
[mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl]
Sent: Thursday, 31 May 2012 5:43 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EN 60950-1 INaccessible parts
Anyone aware of what seems as a typo to me
in EN 60950-1:2006 in par
31(0)104154953
Van: Kevin Richardson [mailto:kevin.richard...@ieee.org]
Verzonden: Thursday, May 31, 2012 11:11 AM
Aan: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen;
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: RE: [PSES] EN 60950-1 INaccessible parts
Hi Gert,
Remember that clause 5.3.4 deals
)104152426
F 31(0)104154953
Van: Kevin Richardson [mailto:kevin.richard...@ieee.org]
Verzonden: Thursday, May 31, 2012 11:11 AM
Aan: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen;
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: RE: [PSES] EN 60950-1 INaccessible parts
Hi Gert,
Remember that clause 5.3.4
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: Re: [PSES] EN 60950-1 INaccessible parts
Gert,
It would seem a motherboard is SELV circuitry and not subject to
functional spacings or a dielectric test. Or am I misunderstanding your
application?
Doug
Douglas E Powell
doug...@gmail.com mailto:doug...@gmail.com
5 matches
Mail list logo