[PSES] EN 60950-1 INaccessible parts

2012-05-31 Thread ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
Anyone aware of what seems as a typo to me in EN 60950-1:2006 in par 5.3.4 it say that clearance and creepage distances for functional isolation must be respected for INaccessible parts ... Whats the sense of guarding the isolation to not accessible parts At the same time,

Re: [PSES] EN 60950-1 INaccessible parts

2012-05-31 Thread Kevin Richardson
consequence of its use. From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen [mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl] Sent: Thursday, 31 May 2012 5:43 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] EN 60950-1 INaccessible parts Anyone aware of what seems as a typo to me in EN 60950-1:2006 in par

Re: [PSES] EN 60950-1 INaccessible parts

2012-05-31 Thread ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
31(0)104154953 Van: Kevin Richardson [mailto:kevin.richard...@ieee.org] Verzonden: Thursday, May 31, 2012 11:11 AM Aan: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Onderwerp: RE: [PSES] EN 60950-1 INaccessible parts Hi Gert, Remember that clause 5.3.4 deals

Re: [PSES] EN 60950-1 INaccessible parts

2012-05-31 Thread Doug Powell
)104152426 F 31(0)104154953 Van: Kevin Richardson [mailto:kevin.richard...@ieee.org] Verzonden: Thursday, May 31, 2012 11:11 AM Aan: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Onderwerp: RE: [PSES] EN 60950-1 INaccessible parts Hi Gert, Remember that clause 5.3.4

Re: [PSES] EN 60950-1 INaccessible parts

2012-05-31 Thread ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Onderwerp: Re: [PSES] EN 60950-1 INaccessible parts Gert, It would seem a motherboard is SELV circuitry and not subject to functional spacings or a dielectric test. Or am I misunderstanding your application? Doug Douglas E Powell doug...@gmail.com mailto:doug...@gmail.com