In message <1672c357-c6fb-4553-b36e-7d0f23626...@mac.com>, dated Wed, 10
Jul 2013, Douglas Nix writes:
IMO, the key words are "...intended to be used permanently at a
predefined location". If the machine could be purchased by any customer
and used in any location, even if it's a one-off, then
In message <99532047d6a52847ab271f822ae9efdcacc10...@cktexmb01.cds.int>,
dated Wed, 10 Jul 2013, "Paasche, Dieter"
writes:
t looks however from John?s comments that a machine is a fixed
installation, if it is custom made and there will never be another
machine like that in another place. So,
s and fixed installation reference Article 5, so
> strictly speaking from the testing point of view, both have to be tested for
> EMC. Is that correct?
>
> Thanks
>
> Dieter Paasche
>
>
> From: Doug Nix [mailto:d...@complianceinsight.ca]
> Sent: July 10, 2
r EMC. Is
that correct?
Thanks
Dieter Paasche
From: Doug Nix [mailto:d...@complianceinsight.ca]
Sent: July 10, 2013 2:37 PM
To: Paasche, Dieter
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fixed Installation vs Apparatus
Dieter,
Have a look at the attached Guidance document from the EC. On page 15, Section
1.1.5 and f
In message <99532047d6a52847ab271f822ae9efdcacc10...@cktexmb01.cds.int>,
dated Wed, 10 Jul 2013, "Paasche, Dieter"
writes:
At which point could you define a piece of machinery a fixed
Installation?
What are the differences in reference to EMC testing? It looks to me
that regardless of a
Hi group,
At which point could you define a piece of machinery a fixed Installation?
What are the differences in reference to EMC testing? It looks to me that
regardless of a piece of machinery being considered an apparatus or a fixed
installation, it still has to be tested to comply with EMC
6 matches
Mail list logo
