Re: [PSES] Outdoor Bluetooth speakers

Allen; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] Outdoor Bluetooth speakers I think EN 60905-22 is overkill for occasional use outdoors. 1 Scope 1.1 Equipment covered This part of IEC 60950 applies to information technology equipment intended to be installed in an OUTDOOR LOCATION

Re: [PSES] Outdoor Bluetooth speakers

December 2015 17:34 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Outdoor Bluetooth speakers Good evening I had the same idea as Ken re 60950-22 - and then got to thinking about 62368-1 which is replacing both 60065 & 60950, and the likelihood of a "Part XX" to that standard.

Re: [PSES] Outdoor Bluetooth speakers

Hi Scott, I don't have any experience in this area but have you looked at 60950-22? On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Scott Xe wrote: > It is my first time to test an audio product for outdoor use. The product > is powered by rechargeable lithium batteries and primarily

[PSES] Outdoor Bluetooth speakers

It is my first time to test an audio product for outdoor use. The product is powered by rechargeable lithium batteries and primarily used indoors but can be used occasionally for outdoor picnics and/or parties. Traditionally, we use EN 60065 for safety evaluation. Is there any specific

Re: [PSES] Outdoor Bluetooth speakers

Hi Ken, Thanks for your suggestion on 60950-22. I did not know or have this standard but had some search on internet and note that the standard is for equipment intended for outdoors. I doubt it is too tough for my said equipment. That is reason why I believe there may be different levels

Re: [PSES] Outdoor Bluetooth speakers

:21 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Outdoor Bluetooth speakers It is my first time to test an audio product for outdoor use. The product is powered by rechargeable lithium batteries and primarily used indoors but can be used occasionally for outdoor picnics and/or parties

Re: [PSES] Outdoor Bluetooth speakers

"covered". Presumably, however, the IEC Committees will (or should be!) working on a suitable "Part XX" to 62368 - so does anyone have leads on that? John Allen W.London, UK From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 December 2015 17:13 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IE