Re: [PSES] Reduced CE mark

2020-03-18 Thread David Wilson
;> >> Charlie Blackham >> Sulis Consultants Ltd >> Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317 >> Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/ >> Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 >> >> From: Pete Perkins >> Sent: 10 March 2020 15:02 >> To: Charlie Blac

Re: [PSES] Reduced CE mark

2020-03-18 Thread Chris Wordley
s, number 05466247 > > From: Pete Perkins mailto:peperkin...@cs.com>> > Sent: 10 March 2020 15:02 > To: Charlie Blackham <mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com>>; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> > Subject: RE: [PSES] Reduc

Re: [PSES] Reduced CE mark

2020-03-10 Thread Charlie Blackham
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] Reduced CE mark Charlie,Under the circumstances you enumerated, would you then recommend to the manufacturer that they put the ‘reduced’ CE mark on the RED product and also put the larger 5mm CE mark on the packaging? This would seem to meet

Re: [PSES] Reduced CE mark

2020-03-10 Thread Pete Perkins
o be From: Charlie Blackham Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 1:41 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Reduced CE mark Dave The following is stated in the RED Article 19 General principles of the CE marking 1.The CE marking shall be subject to the general principles set o

Re: [PSES] Reduced CE mark

2020-03-10 Thread Charlie Blackham
: https://sulisconsultants.com/ Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 From: Dave Wilson <0271c3568f8a-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> Sent: 10 March 2020 02:53 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Reduced CE mark Hi listmembers, I came across a statement on conformance

[PSES] Reduced CE mark

2020-03-09 Thread Dave Wilson
Hi listmembers, I came across a statement on conformance.co.uk regarding CE marking and size requirements. Although the date shows 2020, it references the R&TTE Directive, so I'm not sure about that. Anyway, it states that for small products it's permissible to reduce the CE mark to 3mm, and th