Re: [PSES] SV: [PSES] TEMPEST and EMC

2017-09-07 Thread Don Gies
AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] SV: [PSES] TEMPEST and EMC Amund: In TEMPEST testing, both the limits and the data were considered classified information. Don: The conflation of TEMPEST and 461 probably arose from the fact that most all equipment requiring T

Re: [PSES] SV: [PSES] TEMPEST and EMC

2017-09-07 Thread Cortland Richmond
Oh yes.  One reason I was hired to do EMC testing after  i retired from the US Army in 1983 was that I had a current SECRET clearance.   THAT'S long gone. Heh! Cortland Richmond larance. On 9/7/2017 2:22 AM, Amund Westin wrote: I was looking for the document NSTISSAM TEMPEST/1-92 /«Comprom

Re: [PSES] SV: [PSES] TEMPEST and EMC

2017-09-07 Thread Edward Price
...@westin-emission.no] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 11:22 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] SV: [PSES] TEMPEST and EMC I was looking for the document NSTISSAM TEMPEST/1-92 «Compromising Emanations Laboratory Test Requirements, Electromagnetics», but I only found a file with

[PSES] SV: [PSES] TEMPEST and EMC

2017-09-06 Thread Amund Westin
I was looking for the document NSTISSAM TEMPEST/1-92 «Compromising Emanations Laboratory Test Requirements, Electromagnetics», but I only found a file with all emission plots covered by a black spot. Classified information? BR Amund Fra: Don Gies [mailto:ddg...@verizon.net] Send