Re: [PSES] Test

Yes, thanks Philip. Mike > On 10/03/2024 3:04 PM CDT Philip wrote: > > > > Test confirmed? > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2024, 2:24 PM MIKE SHERMAN > <347e8d192c85-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org > mailto:347e8d192c85-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org> wrote: > > > Test message only. > >

Re: [PSES] Test

Test confirmed? On Thu, Oct 3, 2024, 2:24 PM MIKE SHERMAN < 347e8d192c85-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org> wrote: > Test message only. > -- > > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc > discussion list. To post a message to the list

[PSES] Test

Test message only. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG All emc-pstc postings are archived and s

Re: [PSES] Test lab in Germany - LVD testing

el: +44 (0)7946 624317 Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/ Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 From: Amund Westin Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 2:22 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Test lab in Germany - LVD testing On behalf of a local company, I'm looking f

[PSES] Test lab in Germany - LVD testing

On behalf of a local company, I’m looking for a German test lab within LVD testing (EN 62368-1). I have a listing of all CB scheme labs in Germany but would appreciate suggestions of other labs. Thanks! Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Mvh Amund Westin *

[PSES] Test

== The information in this email is confidential, and is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized and therefore prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified

[PSES] test message only

- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: https://www.mail-

[PSES] Test lab will not test devices with LiPo batteries

I was in touch with a test lab lately regarding environmental testing (shock, temp cycling, etc.) a device with internal LiPo batteries. They were very concern about testing such device, because if could cause fire, explode, etc. during test. They did not want to test devices which contained L

Re: [PSES] Test only: I have not seen any email since December 2022

It has been quiet.Happy new year to all. Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device Original message From: Richard Georgerian Date: 1/4/23 10:25 AM (GMT-05:00) To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Test only: I have not seen any email since December 2022 Greetings everyone

Re: [PSES] Test only: I have not seen any email since December 2022

Happy New Year !! On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 8:25 AM Richard Georgerian wrote: > * This message originated outside of DISH and was sent by: > richa...@mesanetworks.net * > -- > > Greetings everyone, > > > > Apologies for the email. Just testing as I have not seen any PST

[PSES] Test only: I have not seen any email since December 2022

Greetings everyone, Apologies for the email. Just testing as I have not seen any PSTC emails since the December 21, 2022. Thank-you, .Richard Georgerian Compliance Engineer HID Global - This message is from the IEEE P

Re: [PSES] Test & measurement with cellular module

May be off-topic to your query, but since it is automotive wouldn¹t the unintentional emissions have to meet CISPR 25? Ken Javor Phone: (256) 650-5261 From: Ken Wyatt Reply-To: Ken Wyatt Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:57:39 -0700 To: Subject: [PSES] Test & measurement with cellular module

[PSES] Test & measurement with cellular module

Hi All, Wireless compliance testing is not really my specialty, so putting this out to the group… I have a client that manufactures a data recorder (basically, a non-intensional radiator), but with an FCC-approved cellular modem from Sierra. I believe there’s an option to connect Wi-Fi, but t

[PSES] Test

-- Charles Grasso Dish Technologies (c) 303-204-2974 (h) 303-317-5530 (e ) charles.gra...@dish.com (e2) chasgra...@gmail.com - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To pos

Re: [PSES] test lab for 140 MPH wind testing

of my employer. From: Charlie Blackham Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 7:55 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PSES] test lab for 140 MPH wind testing All I'm looking for a laboratory who can test a 1m x 1m basestation antenna for resilience to hurricane wind gusts B

[PSES] test lab for 140 MPH wind testing

All I'm looking for a laboratory who can test a 1m x 1m basestation antenna for resilience to hurricane wind gusts Best regards Charlie Charlie Blackham Sulis Consultants Ltd Mead House Longwater Road Eversley RG27 0NW UK Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317 Email: char...@sulisconsultants.com

[PSES] Test requirement for Grille Cloth in UL/IEC/EN 62368-1.

Greetings, Would any list member have a comment on a test requirement for Grille Cloth in UL/IEC/EN 62368-1 ? My word search finds no mention of "Grille Cloth" In the past UL 60065 wanted a tablet test performed on cloth. "Grille covering material, cloth, and reticulated foam" The part is to be

[PSES] Test Message

This is just a test message. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the

[PSES] Test Message

This message is just a test. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the

[PSES] Test please ignore

Please ignore - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http:

[PSES] Test Standards Copyright

When we develop a new test report in the CB Format for a test standard, we usually summarize with test requirements for each clause to reduce the size of the overall report. Can the Test Report be a Word-for-Word copy of the test standard, so does it have to be different to avoid copyright issues?

[PSES] test message

I had to reinstall my e-mail app, so this is a test whether I set it up so I can post to the listserver. Rich - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to

[PSES] Test Message - Please disregard

Just a test message to see if anyone is still awake out there in list land. Okay, go back to sleep now. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list,

[PSES] Test Message - Please disregard

Just a test message to see if anyone is still awake out there in list land. Okay, go back to sleep now. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, se

[PSES] test message

Test message Please delete - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the w

[PSES] Test Message

Test Message - Please Delete  - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and

[PSES] Test

Thanks Charles Grasso (w) 303-706-5467 - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and sea

[PSES] Test

Test of my new e...@jwjelp.com email address subscription. Ed Price WB6WSN Chula Vista, CA USA - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send you

Re: [PSES] Test

@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Test Yes we do, not just EMC and electrical safety! Doug Nix d...@ieee.org +1 (519) 729-5704 On 29-Aug-17, at 13:55, Elias Franquis wrote: I am still receiving email from this group. I would like to know if this group also speak about system and software

Re: [PSES] Test

Yes we do, not just EMC and electrical safety! Doug Nix d...@ieee.org +1 (519) 729-5704 > On 29-Aug-17, at 13:55, Elias Franquis wrote: > > I am still receiving email from this group. > > I would like to know if this group also speak about system and software safet. > > Elias > > El mar., 29

Re: [PSES] Test

I am still receiving email from this group. I would like to know if this group also speak about system and software safet. Elias El mar., 29 ago. 2017 a las 19:38, N. Shani () escribió: > So quiet - did I lose my subscription? > - > --

[PSES] Test

So quiet - did I lose my subscription? - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searcha

Re: [PSES] Test voltage for electric strength test in EN 60335-1

bruary 16, 2017 4:51 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Test voltage for electric strength test in EN 60335-1 In clause 13.3 and 16.3 electric strength tests, there are two columns of test voltages: rated voltage and working voltage. What are the differences? Thanks,

[PSES] Test voltage for electric strength test in EN 60335-1

In clause 13.3 and 16.3 electric strength tests, there are two columns of test voltages: rated voltage and working voltage.  What are the differences? Thanks, Scott - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering

Re: [PSES] Test Message - Please Disregard

Test Message - Please Disregard except Scott and Dan -Original Message- From: Scott Douglas [mailto:sdouglas...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2016 1:23 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Test Message - Please Disregard Test Message - Please Disregard

[PSES] Test

Test message. Thanks, Brad - CONFIDENTIAL- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, and may also be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, use, copy, or distribute this message. If you receive this

Re: [PSES] Test Message - Please Disregard

Test Message - Please Disregard except Scott -Original Message- From: Scott Douglas [mailto:sdouglas...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2016 1:23 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Test Message - Please Disregard Test Message - Please Disregard

[PSES] Test Message - Please Disregard

Test Message - Please Disregard - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on

Re: [PSES] test message

Ralph McDiarmid Product Compliance Engineering Solar Business Schneider Electric D 604-422-2622 3700 Gilmore Way Burnaby, BC, V5G 4M1 Canada This message was scanned by Exchange Online Protection Services. - ---

Re: [PSES] test message

. -Original Message- From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 1:16 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] test message Test message. I'm still not seeing any of my posts reflected back to me. Are they appearing on the list? With best w

Re: [PSES] test message

this e-mail -Original Message- From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 12:16 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] test message Test message. I'm still not seeing any of my posts reflected back to me. Are they appearing on the

Re: [PSES] test message

--Original Message- > From: Paasche, Dieter [mailto:dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com] > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 6:26 PM > To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > Subject: Re: [PSES] test message > > Hi John, > > Received it too. Could it be that your own address

[PSES] test message

Test message. I'm still not seeing any of my posts reflected back to me. Are they appearing on the list? With best wishes OOO - Own Opinions Only www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England - This message is fr

Re: [PSES] test message

John Received here. John Allen W.London, UK -Original Message- From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] Sent: 18 March 2016 17:16 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] test message Test message. I'm still not seeing any of my posts reflected back to me. Are

[PSES] Test message 160319

Test message 160319 at the request of Scott Douglas. With best wishes OOO - Own Opinions Only www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-p

Re: [PSES] test message

, 2016 6:16 PM > To: John Woodgate > Subject: RE: [PSES] test message > > John, > > I'm not sure if you're referring to when you replied to my question earlier today, > but if you are, you replied only to me and not the list. > > Regards, > > Elliot

[PSES] Test message only

Test message. Please ignore. With best wishes OOO - Own Opinions Only www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To

Re: [PSES] Test Standards for a Wax Warmer per EU

EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Test Standards for a Wax Warmer per EU Dear Members, Could you please comment EU test standards for a wax warmer, using light bulbs (such as http://www.bedbathandbeyond.com/store/product/full-size-wax-warmer-25-watt-replacement-bulbs-set-of-2/1041252949?skuId

Re: [PSES] Test Standards for a Wax Warmer per EU

: [PSES] Test Standards for a Wax Warmer per EU The test standards for lighting equipment are much less strict than for non-lighting equipment. So it would actually be beneficial for it to count as a lighting device. With that said, 55015 seems to be written for devices with a primary function of

Re: [PSES] Test Standards for a Wax Warmer per EU

o:graceli...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 9:59 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Test Standards for a Wax Warmer per EU Dear Members, Could you please comment EU test standards for a wax warmer, using light bulbs (such as http://www.bedbathandbeyond.com/store/product/

[PSES] Test Standards for a Wax Warmer per EU

Dear Members, Could you please comment EU test standards for a wax warmer, using light bulbs (such as http://www.bedbathandbeyond.com/store/product/full-size-wax-warmer-25-watt-replacement-bulbs-set-of-2/1041252949?skuId=41252949&mcid=PS_googlepla_nonbrand_homedecor_&adpos=1o3&creative=43742652349

Re: [PSES] Test message

lto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] Sent: 10 December 2015 14:48 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Test message I think my posts about EMC environments are not being reflected. Has anyone seen my quotes from the Scopes of 61000-6-1 and -2? With best wishes. OOO - Own Opinions Only J M Wood

[PSES] Test message

I think my posts about EMC environments are not being reflected. Has anyone seen my quotes from the Scopes of 61000-6-1 and -2? With best wishes. OOO - Own Opinions Only J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh, UK www.jmwa.demon.co.uk - ---

[PSES] Test instruments for automotive component

Greetings, all experts, I want to buy test instruments for EMC of automotive component. The test standards includ ISO 7637-2/3 and ISO 16750-2. I know EM Test and TESEQ have such instruments. But the price is pretty higher. Does anyone recommend other manufacturers produce and sell such test in

[PSES] Test positions open at Washington Labs

Hi Folks, Let me or Steve Koster (ste...@wll.com) know if you have any interest in two lab test positions in Maryland. http://wll.com/us/jobs/ Best regards, Mike Mike Violette American Certification Body mi...@acbcert.com +1 240 401 1388 -

Re: [PSES] Test report for computers with multiple foreseen hard disk configurations.

On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 23:20:12 +, "Crane, Lauren" wrote: > When having a computer system EMC tested, and different hard disk > options are expected to be used over time, but the exact details > (e.g. part number) of those hard disks is not yet known other than > the requirement that they be c

Re: [PSES] Test report for computers with multiple foreseen hard disk configurations.

: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Test report for computers with multiple foreseen hard disk configurations. When having a computer system EMC tested, and different hard disk options are expected to be used over time, but the exact details (e.g. part number) of those hard disks is not yet

Re: [PSES] Test report for computers with multiple foreseen hard disk configurations.

In message utlook.com>, dated Mon, 20 Apr 2015, "Crane, Lauren" writes: When having a computer system EMC tested, and different hard disk options are expected to be used over time, but the exact details (e.g. part number) of those hard disks is not yet known other than the requirement that

[PSES] Test report for computers with multiple foreseen hard disk configurations.

When having a computer system EMC tested, and different hard disk options are expected to be used over time, but the exact details (e.g. part number) of those hard disks is not yet known other than the requirement that they be certified on their own to relevant EMC standards, is there a standard

[PSES] Test message II

testing, 1, 2 & 3... :>) br, Pete Peter E Perkins, PE Principal Product Safety Engineer PO Box 23427 Tigard, ORe 97281-3427 503/452-1201 fone/fax p.perk...@ieee.org - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety E

[PSES] test message

Testing, testing, 1, 2, 3... :>) br, Pete Peter E Perkins, PE Principal Product Safety Engineer PO Box 23427 Tigard, ORe 97281-3427 503/452-1201 fone/fax p.perk...@ieee.org - This message is from the IEEE Produc

Re: [PSES] test errors

., Monmouth, NP255JA, United Kingdom | T: +44 1753 723165 | M: +44 7968 064105 From: dward [mailto:dw...@pctestlab.com] Sent: 18 December 2014 21:38 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] test errors I don’t think the original discussion is or was centered on testing ‘black boxes’ or even

Re: [PSES] test errors

...@vtext.com (e) charles.gra...@echostar.com (e2) chasgra...@gmail.com From: dward [mailto:dw...@pctestlab.com] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 2:38 PM To: Grasso, Charles; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] test errors I don’t think the original discussion is or was centered on testing ‘black

Re: [PSES] test errors

@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] test errors Hello Brian – with regards to the “Top Secret” box. It is my understanding that the customer it responsible for assuring that their product is tested to the correct standard and the test lab is responsible for testing the delivered product

Re: [PSES] test errors

...@lecotc.com] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 8:26 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] test errors Well said. I’m really enjoying this topic. Expecting customers to be Compliance Test experts would be nice, but a little like expecting people to have to be auto mechanics to be

Re: [PSES] test errors

This is an organizational flaw similar to relying on ISO 9000 certification; unless day to day operations are monitored by staff, and performance is periodically audited by subject matter experts from the certifying agency, it is only an exercise in paperwork. Consider that EMC standards now

Re: [PSES] test errors

Excellent point. Ken Javor Phone: (256) 650-5261 From: Ed Price Reply-To: Ed Price Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 04:57:43 -0800 To: Subject: Re: [PSES] test errors Doug: I took the liberty of severely editing you response, but I think the essence of your story is: ³someone who goes to labs with

Re: [PSES] test errors

results. You may now return to your regularly scheduled program. This Other Brian From: Ed Price [mailto:edpr...@cox.net] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 7:58 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] test errors Doug: I took the liberty of severely editing you response, but I

Re: [PSES] test errors

Doug: I took the liberty of severely editing you response, but I think the essence of your story is: “someone who goes to labs with no knowledge of how these tests are run are at a real disadvantage” I thought that the whole purpose of accreditation was to provide protection to the cus

Re: [PSES] Test and Calibration Labs

Hi Doug, A starting point might be the FCC's Contract Test Firm listing at https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/TestFirmSearch.cfm It doesn't reflect lab quality approvals or reputation, but it gives you a list of names to investigate. Pat On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Doug Powell wrote

Re: [PSES] Test and Calibration Labs

I know what you mean. I recommend only test labs I've personally visited or have worked with in the past. You also won't likely go wrong by recommending the large "chains", but there are exceptions, I'm sure. Probably the best bet is to ask around...maybe asking for specifics here, or in one of

[PSES] Test and Calibration Labs

‎All,In recent weeks I have been searching for EMC and Calibration labs in areas of the country where I am not so familiar with who is who.   My clients often want something nearby.  Generally they already know which safety agency they want.  I have used the directories published by ITEM and ‎InCo

Re: [PSES] Test equipment

Richard, I once had an HP spectrum analyzer than had a dim screen after 10+ years of operation. Moving the display centering to use other parts of the phospher didn't help. I then removed the display glass and found a thin, even, layer of dust on the CRT. Thank you, electrostatic precipitation.

Re: [PSES] Test equipment

I have a 19 inch yard-sale LCD TV hooked up to my Advantest R3261A (not a "more modern" instrument). It flickers once in a while, but that doesn't matter for my use. A local firm, "Comprenew," has 48 and 96 inch wall mounted but analog ("not guaranteed to work") TV's/displays for pocket chan

Re: [PSES] Test equipment

From: Richard Marshall [mailto:richard.marshal...@btinternet.com] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 2:41 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Test equipment Hi, I too am the recent proud owner of an HP8753B Network Analyser; a mind-blowingly clever piece of equipment. Recommended

Re: [PSES] Test equipment

In message <356067BD6A034A848DB054322C7EA6B3@delld28c3cd7db>, dated Sat, 28 Jun 2014, Richard Marshall writes: I too am the recent proud owner of an HP8753B Network Analyser; a mind-blowingly clever piece of equipment.  Recommended for its Educational and practical value!.   Hello, Richar

Re: [PSES] Test equipment

Hi, I too am the recent proud owner of an HP8753B Network Analyser; a mind-blowingly clever piece of equipment. Recommended for its Educational and practical value!. As received, the fan ran - but was very noisy. I replaced the fan with an EBM-Papst 4414M, which was slightly quieter - but no

Re: [PSES] Test equipment question

Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:46 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Test equipment question Mine is an "A" model without the LEDs, but thank you for letting me know the fan should be on all the time. Ken Javor Phone:

Re: [PSES] Test equipment question

Mine is an ³A² model without the LEDs, but thank you for letting me know the fan should be on all the time. Ken Javor Phone: (256) 650-5261 From: Jeffrey Gilbert Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:41:03 -0700 To: Ken Javor Cc: Subject: Re: [PSES] Test equipment question Ken, Mine (8753ES) has two

Re: [PSES] Test equipment question

Ken, Mine (8753ES) has two diagnostic LEDs on the back; one on and one off (Normal Operation). The fan is always on. If your LEDs are correct and the fan is not running, I'd say the fan is probably broken or maybe not plugged in inside the unit. On Jun 27, 2014 12:07 PM, "Ken Javor" wrote: >

[PSES] Test equipment question

Am the proud new owner of an (obsolete) HP 8753 network analyzer. The unit works, but the fan doesn¹t come on when powered up. I have all the manuals, but they don¹t say whether the fan should be on at all times, or whether it is thermostatically-controlled. The unit is supposed to shut down in an

[PSES] Test equipment rentals - Northeast USA

‎All,‎I have a client who is looking for a for test equipment rental company specializing in compliance testing. This would include tests such as Surge, EFT/Burst for both 100kHz and 1 MHZ, also Ringwave, CDNs and so on.  It may be possible there will also be a need for other equipment such as acc

Re: [PSES] Test computers

STC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Onderwerp: Re: [PSES] Test computers Am I missing something (always possible). Is the test computer in the RF test field or outside the test field? If only required for the test setup and not part of the device under test and you are doing radiated emissions and immun

Re: [PSES] Test computers

From: McInturff, GarySent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 5:19 PMTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGReply To: McInturff, GarySubject: [PSES] Test computers I’m looking at updating my computer for EMC testing. In this

Re: [PSES] Test computers

Gary, Would plugging your USB test article into a laptop, or an all-in-one, be a valid, representative setup that your customer could possibly employ? If so, then using a laptop or an all-in-one *could* be a legitimate test set-up. When faced with multiple possiblities involving what an EUT migh

Re: [PSES] Test computers

ian From: McInturff, Gary [mailto:gary.mcintu...@esterline.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 4:18 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Test computers I'm looking at updating my computer for EMC testing. In this case the computer is the support equipment rather than the host. Bey

[PSES] Test computers

I'm looking at updating my computer for EMC testing. In this case the computer is the support equipment rather than the host. Beyond just finding a "quiet" computer I would like to know if there is any reason under ANSI C 64 or CISPR 22 etc that would prohibit me from buying an all-in-one comput

Re: [PSES] Test Lab Approved for AS/NZS 3112 Power Plugs?

Austest Laboratories is 100% Australian Owned Keep in touch with us on Facebook From: Mike Sherman - Original Message - [mailto:msherma...@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, 3 October 2013 2:12 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Sub

Re: [PSES] Test Lab Approved for AS/NZS 3112 Power Plugs?

From: Mike Sherman - Original Message - [mailto:msherma...@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, 3 October 2013 2:12 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Test Lab Approved for AS/NZS 3112 Power Plugs? Esteemed colleagues -- I'm looking for a test lab that is approved to r

[PSES] Test Lab Approved for AS/NZS 3112 Power Plugs?

Esteemed colleagues -- I'm looking for a test lab that is approved to run AS/NZS 3112 power plug tests in order to obtain a certificate for our design from Australian authorities. Can you recommend one, or are you one? Please reply privately. Thanks! Mike Sherman Graco Inc. msh

Re: [PSES] Test facility insurance

Cost and competence are not the sole considerations. John From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com] Sent: 25 September 2013 15:02 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Test facility insurance Scott I recall a conversation on another email reflector which noted that a &q

Re: [PSES] Test facility insurance

many > contractual agreements and liability limitations for UK consultants and test > labs seem to be limited to 100% or 125% of order value. > > Regards > Charlie > > > From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] > Sent: 25 September 2013 14:36 > To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV

Re: [PSES] Test facility insurance

osses" are typically excluded from many contractual agreements and liability limitations for UK consultants and test labs seem to be limited to 100% or 125% of order value. Regards Charlie From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] Sent: 25 September 2013 14:36 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

Re: [PSES] Test facility insurance

It is very interesting subject. From time to time, we appoint 3rd party laboratories for the testing work. In case there is an error regardless of interpretation or careless mistake, it may result in rework cost of several million dollars. I do not believe any 3rd party testing laboratory to cov

Re: [PSES] Test facility insurance

rance lawyers carry? Ed Price WB6WSN Chula Vista, CA USA From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:05 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Test facility insurance I don't know about such things but recently our company wa

Re: [PSES] Test facility insurance

If I had my own company I would seek advice from a good corporate lawyer and insurance company to get what you need and not what you don't need. The Other Brian From: Ken MacGrath [mailto:khcmacgr...@aol.com] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 5:47 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [

Re: [PSES] Test facility insurance

ication of single person. Brian From: Ken MacGrath [mailto:khcmacgr...@aol.com] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 2:47 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Test facility insurance Hello Group, I'm the owner of an EMC/Product Safety/Reliability/Environmental test facility in Ne

[PSES] Test facility insurance

Hello Group, I'm the owner of an EMC/Product Safety/Reliability/Environmental test facility in New Hampshire and would greatly appreciate your input on insurance. What would you suggest for coverage, and should test engineers have professional liability insurance? Thank you! Ken MacGrath

[PSES] Test Email - Delete

Test of Emc-pstc email list. Jim Bacher List admin Past President IEEE PSES j.bac...@ieee.org - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-m

[PSES] Test Message

This is a test. This is only a test. Do not adjust the controls of your TV set. This is only a test. Checking to see if the latest changes at IEEE are still sending list messages out to us all. Scott Douglas EMC-PSTC List admin - --

  1   2   >