Dear Bostjan:
One of the uses of current rating on equipment is to determine that the
equipment, with all of the other equipment, would not overload the mains
circuit. If the actual current exceeds the marked current, then the equipment,
with all of the other equipment, can overload the
In message fe454ecafb4cfe4a89dd78f78ef9e38fa03...@ser-ex01.siq.si,
dated Sun, 17 May 2015, =?iso-8859-2?Q?Bo=B9tjan_Glavi=E8?=
bostjan.gla...@siq.si writes:
Does anyone know what is behind the requirement, that measured input
current of the unit can exceed the rated current by 10%? Where this
In message fe454ecafb4cfe4a89dd78f78ef9e38fa03...@ser-ex01.siq.si,
dated Sun, 17 May 2015, =?utf-8?B?Qm/FoXRqYW4gR2xhdmnEjQ==?=
bostjan.gla...@siq.si writes:
Thank you. But for example if I measure 10% more than rated, it is
still pass by the standard and I test only one sample. So in real
Dear experts,
Does anyone know what is behind the requirement, that measured input current of
the unit can exceed the rated current by 10%? Where this 10% come from?
Best regards,
Bostjan
-
This message is from the IEEE
Hi Bostjan!
I had heard (and perhaps this is apocryphal) that the 10% was intended to
allow for manufacturing tolerances in the final product. I don't know how
the number was arrived at.
-Ken
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Boštjan Glavič bostjan.gla...@siq.si
wrote:
Dear experts,
Does
:24 AM
To: Boštjan Glavič
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] input current rating
Hi Bostjan!
I had heard (and perhaps this is apocryphal) that the 10% was intended to allow
for manufacturing tolerances in the final product. I don't know how the number
was arrived at.
-Ken
On Sun
6 matches
Mail list logo
