Perkins [mailto:0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 8:08 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] safety standard - mobile inverters
Ralph, et al,
Thanx to Bostjan for this reference.
IEC 62477-1 Safety requirements for power ele
From: Adam Dixon [mailto:lanterna.viri...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 1:03 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] safety standard - mobile inverters
What about IEC 62109-2 with emphasis on standalone (i.e. not grid-connected)?
Regards,
Adam in Atlanta
mailto:ad
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] safety standard - mobile inverters
What about IEC 62477-1: Safety requirements for power electronic converter
systems and equipment - Part 1: General
With kind regards,
Boštjan Glavič
Head of Laboratory
Safety and Electromagnetics
phone +386
7 9:03 AM
To: John Woodgate
Cc: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [PSES] safety standard - mobile inverters
What about IEC 62109-2 with emphasis on standalone (i.e. not grid-connected)?
Regards,
Adam in Atlanta
adam.di...@ieee.org <mailto:adam.di...@ieee.org>
IEC 62109-2:2011
Saf
From: Adam Dixon [mailto:lanterna.viri...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 10:03 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] safety standard - mobile inverters
What about IEC 62109-2 with emphasis on standalone (i.e. not grid-connected)?
Regards,
Adam in Atlanta
adam.di
ciates Rayleigh England
>
> Sylvae in aeternum manent.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralph McDiarmid [mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 7:37 PM
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [PSES] safety standard - mobile
anent.
-Original Message-
From: Ralph McDiarmid [mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 7:37 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] safety standard - mobile inverters
Dear group,
I am looking for suggestions on best-fit product s
ary. Do not try this at home. The scenario presented above
may be a dramatic reenactment.
-Original Message-
From: Ralph McDiarmid [mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 11:37 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] safety standard - m
Dear group,
I am looking for suggestions on best-fit product safety standard for LVD for a
230V inverter intended for vehicular use only. (buses & small trucks)
Test lab suggests EN60950, which I dismissed. EN50178 and EN60335-1 don’t
appear to be suitable. I’m really looking for an IEC equiv
9 matches
Mail list logo
