Re: 60950 clauses

2003-02-19 Thread Kim Boll Jensen
Dear Brian Please indicate where in the standard these references are made, because it could be that they should have referred to another clause which exist. Best regards, Kim Boll Jensen Bolls Raadgivning Denmark www.bolls.dk boconn...@t-yuden.com skriver: The index of my copy of EN

Re: 60950 clauses

2003-02-18 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that boconn...@t-yuden.com wrote (in F7E9180F6F7F58 40858d3db815e4f7ad1f2...@cms21.t-yuden.com) about '60950 clauses' on Tue, 18 Feb 2003: The index of my copy of EN 60950:2000 refers to non-existent clauses (e.g., 7.x, 1.2.13.14, etc). Is is safe to assume

RE: 60950 clauses

2003-02-18 Thread richwo...@tycoint.com
...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: 60950 clauses The index of my copy of EN 60950:2000 refers to non-existent clauses (e.g., 7.x, 1.2.13.14, etc). Is is safe to assume that these are typos ? R/S, Brian O'Connell Taiyo Yuden (USA), Inc.

60950 clauses

2003-02-18 Thread boconn...@t-yuden.com
The index of my copy of EN 60950:2000 refers to non-existent clauses (e.g., 7.x, 1.2.13.14, etc). Is is safe to assume that these are typos ? R/S, Brian O'Connell Taiyo Yuden (USA), Inc.