I read in !emc-pstc that dlohb...@aol.com wrote (in <13f.dcb713b.2a043a2
1...@aol.com>) about 'CE MARKING A SYSTEM', on Fri, 3 May 2002:
>
>So true, the TCF route is not intended to get around the requirements. It is
>mainly for large machines that can not be moved a
So true, the TCF route is not intended to get around the requirements. It is
mainly for large machines that can not be moved and products with numerous
configuations that can not be fully tested, etc...
Regards,
David Lohbeck
"CE Marking Hanbook"
---
Th
Message-
From: Gordon,Ian [mailto:ian.gor...@edwards.boc.com]
Sent: 02 May 2002 09:41
To: 'IEEE EMC & SAFETY PSTC'
Subject: RE: CE MARKING A SYSTEM
Eric Lifsey (hellflo...@aol.com)wrote:
http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/
---
T
sage-
> From: Gordon,Ian [SMTP:ian.gor...@edwards.boc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:41 AM
> To: 'IEEE EMC & SAFETY PSTC'
> Subject: RE: CE MARKING A SYSTEM
>
>
> Eric Lifsey (hellflo...@aol.com)wrote:
>
> tests
> for
> isn't
Eric Lifsey (hellflo...@aol.com)wrote:
http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
I read in !emc-pstc that rehel...@mmm.com wrote (in
) about 'CE MARKING A
SYSTEM', on Wed, 1 May 2002:
>Contrary to popular opinion, the TCF route is not designed to "get around"
>standards.
Indeed. It is intended, in one instance, to accommodate circumstances in
wh
rate/3M/US)
Subject: Re: CE MARKING A SYSTEM
04/30/2002
n,Ian [mailto:ian.gor...@edwards.boc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:57 AM
To: 'IEEE EMC & SAFETY PSTC'
Subject: CE MARKING A SYSTEM
Can anyone advise the course of action in applying a CE mark as regards EMC
to a system some of whose component parts are not built by us and whose D
I read in !emc-pstc that Gordon,Ian wrote
(in ) about 'CE
MARKING A SYSTEM', on Tue, 30 Apr 2002:
>Can anyone advise the course of action in applying a CE mark as regards EMC
>to a system some of whose component parts are not built by us and whose D of
>C's claim l
o.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE MARKING A SYSTEM
Gordon, cosider constructing a Technical Construction File (TCF) and
submitting it to a Competent Body. Your product may comply with the
essential requirements when operating in its intended environment without
the need to apply the full industrial strength
argument to the CB.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International
-Original Message-
From: Gordon,Ian [mailto:ian.gor...@edwards.boc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:57 AM
To: 'IEEE EMC & SAFETY PSTC'
Subject: CE MARKING A SYSTEM
Can anyone advise the cours
Can anyone advise the course of action in applying a CE mark as regards EMC
to a system some of whose component parts are not built by us and whose D of
C's claim light industrial immunity. However, the system has been running in
very harsh environments e.g. plasma etch applications at customer si
12 matches
Mail list logo
