CE marking and additional information requirements

2003-02-06 Thread Georgerian, Richard
Greetings All, Thank-you to everyone who responded to my queries. Richard == Richard Georgerian Compliance Engineer Carrier Access Corporation 5395 Pearl Parkway Boulder, CO 80301 USA Tele: 303-218-5748 Fax: 303-218-5503 mailto:rgeorger...@carrier

Re: CE marking and additional information requirements

2003-02-06 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Barker, Neil wrote (in <4f826f960057d4118ec3009027e2453808a52...@whl17.e2v.uk>) about 'CE marking and additional information requirements' on Thu, 6 Feb 2003: >I quite agree that unmarked product cannot be in free circulation. >I wasn't i

Re: CE marking and additional information requirements

2003-02-05 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Barker, Neil wrote (in <4f826f960057d4118ec3009027e2453808a52...@whl17.e2v.uk>) about 'CE marking and additional information requirements' on Wed, 5 Feb 2003: > >John Woodgate wrote: >> >> I read in !emc-pstc that Neil H

Re: CE marking and additional information requirements

2003-02-05 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Barker, Neil wrote (in <4f826f960057d4118ec3009027e2453808a52...@whl17.e2v.uk>) about 'CE marking and additional information requirements' on Wed, 5 Feb 2003: >I have to both agree and disagree with this opinion. >The CE marking does carry some

Re: CE marking and additional information requirements

2003-02-04 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that John Roche wrote (in <200302041134_mc3-1-2829-4...@compuserve.com>) about 'CE marking and additional information requirements' on Tue, 4 Feb 2003: >The raison d'etre for the CE Marking scheme is to inform the end-user that >the product meets

Re: CE marking and additional information requirements

2003-02-04 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Neil Helsby wrote (in <20030204.8161...@mis.configured.host>) about 'CE marking and additional information requirements' on Tue, 4 Feb 2003: >"The CE marking must be affixed to the apparatus or data plate. Where >this is not possible or not

CE marking and additional information requirements

2003-02-04 Thread John Roche
Richard In practice we see the CE Mark itself displayed in a variety of different ways; on its own, as part of a label, not on the label at all, not on the product at all (but on the packaging or in the User Manual). All seem quite acceptable and legal. The raison d'etre for the CE Marking sche

Re: CE marking and additional information requirements

2003-02-04 Thread Neil Helsby
To quote: "The CE marking must be affixed to the apparatus or data plate. Where this is not possible or not warranted on account of the nature of that apparatus, it must be affixed to the packaging, if any, and to the accompanying documents." Regards, Neil Helsby *

CE marking and additional information requirements

2003-02-03 Thread Georgerian, Richard
Greetings All, Variants of the CE marking question have been raised before, so here's another one or two. Does the CE mark have to be located near other information such has company name/trade mark, product name/model number or electrical ratings? Or can it stand alone without such information?

Re: CE marking and additional information requirements

2003-02-03 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Georgerian, Richard wrote (in ) about 'CE marking and additional information requirements' on Mon, 3 Feb 2003: >Does the CE mark have to be located near other information such has company >name/trade mark, product name/model number or electrical