orola Confidential Restricted (MCR),
[ X ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[] General Public
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Flavin, John
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 2:14 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: CISPR22:2005
Confidential Restricted (MCR),
[ X ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[] General Public
From: emcp...@aol.com [mailto:emcp...@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:50 PM
To: Elliott Mac-FME001; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005
Hi
door.com
[mailto:michael_sundst...@overheaddoor.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:38 PM
To: Elliott Mac-FME001; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005
Mac,
Has the FCC changed it's position on needing reflection (bounce) ground plane
requirement? Seems like you'll need
ehalf Of Elliott
Mac-FME001
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 7:15 AM
To: emcp...@aol.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005
Hey Tim / group
I don't know whether or not this would meet the CISPR requirements but may be
a place to start.
The proposed ANSI C63.4
rom: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
emcp...@aol.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 7:49 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005
Hello Group,
I have a question on the new CISPR22 ammen
m
OFC: 214-579-6312
CELL: 940-390-3644
KB5UKT
Elliott Mac-FME001
06/16/2009 09:14 AM
Please respond to
Elliott Mac-FME001
To
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
cc
Subject
Re: [PSES] CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005
Hey Tim / group
I don't know whether or not this would meet the CIS
-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005
Hello Group,
I have a question on the new CISPR22 ammendment that becomes effective
10-2010. It requires free space emission measurements above 1GHz. This is
typically done with ferrite absorber on the chamber floor.
How does one address
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:49:18 EDT,
emcp...@aol.com wrote:
> I have a question on the new CISPR22 ammendment that becomes effective
> 10-2010. It requires free space emission measurements above 1GHz. This is
> typically done with ferrite absorber on the chamber floor.
>
> How does one address
Hello Group,
I have a question on the new CISPR22 ammendment that becomes effective
10-2010. It requires free space emission measurements above 1GHz. This is
typically done with ferrite absorber on the chamber floor.
How does one address this issue when testing on a 10 meter OATS? Are there any
9 matches
Mail list logo