RE: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005

2009-06-16 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
orola Confidential Restricted (MCR), [ X ] Motorola Internal Use Only [] General Public From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Flavin, John Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 2:14 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: CISPR22:2005

RE: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005

2009-06-16 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Confidential Restricted (MCR), [ X ] Motorola Internal Use Only [] General Public From: emcp...@aol.com [mailto:emcp...@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:50 PM To: Elliott Mac-FME001; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005 Hi

RE: [PSES] CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005

2009-06-16 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
door.com [mailto:michael_sundst...@overheaddoor.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:38 PM To: Elliott Mac-FME001; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005 Mac, Has the FCC changed it's position on needing reflection (bounce) ground plane requirement? Seems like you'll need

RE: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005

2009-06-16 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
ehalf Of Elliott Mac-FME001 Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 7:15 AM To: emcp...@aol.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005 Hey Tim / group I don't know whether or not this would meet the CISPR requirements but may be a place to start. The proposed ANSI C63.4

Re: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005

2009-06-16 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
rom: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of emcp...@aol.com Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 7:49 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005 Hello Group, I have a question on the new CISPR22 ammen

Re: [PSES] CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005

2009-06-16 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
m OFC: 214-579-6312 CELL: 940-390-3644 KB5UKT Elliott Mac-FME001 06/16/2009 09:14 AM Please respond to Elliott Mac-FME001 To EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG cc Subject Re: [PSES] CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005 Hey Tim / group I don't know whether or not this would meet the CIS

RE: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005

2009-06-16 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005 Hello Group, I have a question on the new CISPR22 ammendment that becomes effective 10-2010. It requires free space emission measurements above 1GHz. This is typically done with ferrite absorber on the chamber floor. How does one address

Re: CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005

2009-06-16 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:49:18 EDT, emcp...@aol.com wrote: > I have a question on the new CISPR22 ammendment that becomes effective > 10-2010. It requires free space emission measurements above 1GHz. This is > typically done with ferrite absorber on the chamber floor. > > How does one address

CISPR22:2005 + A1:2005

2009-06-15 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hello Group, I have a question on the new CISPR22 ammendment that becomes effective 10-2010. It requires free space emission measurements above 1GHz. This is typically done with ferrite absorber on the chamber floor. How does one address this issue when testing on a 10 meter OATS? Are there any