RE: ERA Report 69-30

2003-12-11 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Whatever you can do, john, would be appreciated. Regards, Peter L. Tarver, PE ptar...@ieee.org > From: John Allen > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:55 AM > > Peter > > I can't investigate all of them (we sell far too > many!) but I will try to > find out the new numbers for all of th

Re: ERA Report 69-30

2003-12-10 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
ot;Peter L. Tarver" To: Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:21 PM Subject: RE: ERA Report 69-30 My thanks to all responders. It is noteworthy that Part IX (Sustained Current Ratings for Thermosetting Insulated Cables) is orderable on-line (the web store does not indicate paper or soft

RE: ERA Report 69-30

2003-12-10 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
My thanks to all responders. It is noteworthy that Part IX (Sustained Current Ratings for Thermosetting Insulated Cables) is orderable on-line (the web store does not indicate paper or soft copy, so paper must be assumed) for £50, with a 10% discount for persons registering with AccessERA during

Fw: ERA Report 69-30

2003-12-10 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
ow. Regards John Allen (from home) - Original Message - From: "Hazel Mumford" To: "'John Allen'" Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:23 PM Subject: RE: ERA Report 69-30 John, I presume that they're referring to "Current rating standards for distribu

Re: ERA Report 69-30 - URGENT

2003-12-10 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
home) - Original Message - From: "Luke Turnbull" To: ; Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:59 AM Subject: Re: ERA Report 69-30 > > Peter, > > I've just spoken to a colleague who used to work at ERA. He says that this is a very old document - issued in 1

Re: ERA Report 69-30

2003-12-10 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
/09/03 04:37pm >>> ERA Report 69-30 appears to exist in the shadows of other documents. It is referenced by a number of standards for wiring rules, but the document itself does not show up in standards suppliers or general web searches. Perhaps it's too old to be in current publi

RE: ERA Report 69-30

2003-12-09 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
t; Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:48 AM > > I read in !emc-pstc that Peter L. Tarver > about 'ERA Report 69-30' on Tue, 9 Dec 2003: > > >ERA Report 69-30 appears to exist in the shadows > of other documents. It > >is referenced by a number of standards fo

Re: ERA Report 69-30

2003-12-09 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
I read in !emc-pstc that Peter L. Tarver wrote (in ) about 'ERA Report 69-30' on Tue, 9 Dec 2003: >ERA Report 69-30 appears to exist in the shadows of other documents. It >is referenced by a number of standards for wiring rules, but the >document itself does not s

ERA Report 69-30

2003-12-09 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
ERA Report 69-30 appears to exist in the shadows of other documents. It is referenced by a number of standards for wiring rules, but the document itself does not show up in standards suppliers or general web searches. Perhaps it's too old to be in current publication. Can someone help me