Dave Heald Wrote:
Regardless, every piece of CO equipment (at least owned by the RBOC)
should be immune to 9.8 or so V/m signals and any exceptions should be
known by the CO administrators as such information is included in a NEBS
report (Immunity to 10V/m is a conditional requirement only - I
You need to keep fields below the NEBS immunity limits, which are pretty
low, IMHO. However, a 300 mW cellphone is not the same danger as a 5 watt
high-band HT.
Cortland
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee
Ed,
I don't know of any approved cell phones that can be used within a cental
office. It seems like it would be up to each central office/telco to make that
decision.
As far as field strength from cell phones, 5 to 10 V/m is what I have also heard
As you may know, GR-1089 has an RF immunity
A few days ago, I got a little involved in a Usenet discussion about a
contractor using his cell phone within a Telco CO while working on equipment
repairs / upgrades. My position was that I didn't think this was a good
idea, since I know that a cell phone will create about 5 to 10 V/M at about
2
4 matches
Mail list logo
