Re: EN61000-3-2:2000 Harmonic current emissions

2002-07-25 Thread Scott Douglas
John, I was looking at my copy of 61000-3-2 to find the references you all are making. My copy does not have a paragraph 6.2.3.3 for example. Then I realized you are referring to EN 61000-3-2 : 2000. What I have is IEC 61000-3-2 : 2000. Can anyone tell me that there is that big a difference

Re: EN61000-3-2:2000 Harmonic current emissions

2002-07-25 Thread John Barnes
Neil, If the power supplies are intended for audio equipment, where the peak power required for some types of music can be 10 times the average power, I could buy the manufacturer's explanation. Otherwise their explanation of how they pass EN 61000-3-2:2000 sounds bogus to me. An EN

Re: EN61000-3-2:2000 Harmonic current emissions

2002-07-24 Thread Ted Rook
Neil I can't answer your question directly, but..the EMC rules have provisions which allow exclusion of items which draw more than 1kW and or are not for consumer applications. Your power supplies may fall inside these exclusions and therefore may not need EMC evaluation. We have a

EN61000-3-2:2000 Harmonic current emissions

2002-07-24 Thread Neil Helsby
Hi, We have been using pfc corrected power supplies where each harmonic has met the requirements of EN61000-3-2 Class A limits. Investigating some new ranges of power supplies, we find that some individual harmonic currents exceed the limits. The manufacturers have quoted sections 3Z1, 3Z3,

Re: Harmonic current emissions

2002-01-24 Thread CherryClough
Dear Rich Many thanks for your useful analyses. I was wrong to suggest that the 'computer industry' is in denial about mains harmonics - I realise that many people in that industry have made and are making valuable contributions in that field. But I am sure that the claims that there is 'no

Re: Harmonic current emissions

2002-01-24 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in 200201232308.paa21...@epgc264.sdd.hp.com) about 'Harmonic current emissions', on Wed, 23 Jan 2002: The additional cost for a PF-corrected SMPS is not a constant adder; it is proportional to power output. One must use higher power

Re: Harmonic current emissions

2002-01-23 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: But whichever method is adopted, the customer pays the bill eventually and I have more confidence in the highly competitive world of electronic products to come up with a cost-effective solution in a timely manner. One of the USA's major objections to

Re: Harmonic current emissions

2002-01-23 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in 200201232003.maa21...@epgc264.sdd.hp.com) about 'Harmonic current emissions', on Wed, 23 Jan 2002: Hi Keith and Ghery: There are a number of effects of harmonic current emission from non-linear loads. 1) When a large number

Harmonic current emissions

2002-01-23 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Keith and Ghery: There are a number of effects of harmonic current emission from non-linear loads. 1) When a large number of loads rich in triplen harmonics are supplied from a 3-phase source, the neutral current can be as high as root 3 of the phase current. (This effect