Re: Harmonics, WAS: 2 Phases in North America

I read in !emc-pstc that Hans Mellberg wrote (in <20011218072701.24359.qm...@web13003.mail.yahoo.com>) about 'Harmonics, WAS: 2 Phases in North America', on Mon, 17 Dec 2001: >A harmonic frequency does NOT imply a multiplier of, but one that >sympathetically resonate

Harmonics, WAS: 2 Phases in North America

If one uses the analogies from tuning forks, then it should be obvious. The first harmonic or the fundamental, is the the first sympathetic resonance of the adjacent tuning fork which happens to be the fundamental. And, it so happens that by definitions the first harmonic IS the fundamental. It