, Ed [SMTP:ed.pr...@cubic.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 7:07 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:RE: Lightning Surge Characterization/Standards THANKS
>-Original Message-
>From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
>Sent: Thursday, August 0
I read in !emc-pstc that Price, Ed wrote (in
) about
'Lightning Surge Characterization/Standards THANKS' on Thu, 7 Aug 2003:
>1 of a noun : having but one form to indicate either sex
I meant STRICTLY that gloss, of course, NOT any of the others.
--
Regards, John Woodga
>-Original Message-
>From: John Woodgate [ mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
>Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:23 AM
>To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
>Subject: Re: Lightning Surge Characterization/Standards THANKS
>
>
>
>I read in !emc-pstc that
I read in !emc-pstc that Chris Chileshe
wrote (in <01c35ce5.8dbac680.chris.chile...@ultronics.com>) about
'Lightning Surge Characterization/Standards THANKS' on Thu, 7 Aug 2003:
>Err.. should that read "Ladies and Gentlemen"?
There may well be some ladies who ar
TP:allaman...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:13 PM
To: n...@world.std.com; t...@world.std.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Lightning Surge Characterization/Standards THANKS
Gentlemen,
It never ceases to amaze me at the quality of
knowledge base availab
Gentlemen,
It never ceases to amaze me at the quality of
knowledge base available on this newsgroup.
Thank you all; you have been very helpful. You have
answered all my questions and have given me some great
pointers to look at and think on.
Anil
__
Do you Yaho
meet conducted
emissions.
Dave Cuthbert
Micron Technology
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:05 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Lightning Surge Characterization/Standards
I read in !emc-pstc that Cole, Bryan [LBRT/CCC]
I read in !emc-pstc that Cole, Bryan [LBRT/CCC] wrote (in <4432F34B6251D611A58800508BEF12FF06AAC5@nyfld01.
liebert.com>) about 'Lightning Surge Characterization/Standards' on Wed,
6 Aug 2003:
>TC81 is tasked with the lightning characterization to the structure.
>TC37 lo
/Standards
I read in !emc-pstc that Anil Allamaneni wrote
(in <20030805163726.21224.qm...@web13507.mail.yahoo.com>) about
'Lightning Surge Characterization/Standards' on Tue, 5 Aug 2003:
>2) Is somebody working on re-charaterization of lightning strikes
>throughout US (eg,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 05/08/2003, 17:37:26, Anil Allamaneni wrote
regarding Lightning Surge Characterization/Standards:
> Greetings folks
This is an an interesting sort of problem with a number of factors. (A
former manager used to turn gray when I called something "interesting.")
One might see a very slow longitudinal DC motion as charges pass over
elevated lines, sometimes enough to fire protectors. DSL equipment uses,
and is ope
I read in !emc-pstc that Anil Allamaneni wrote
(in <20030805163726.21224.qm...@web13507.mail.yahoo.com>) about
'Lightning Surge Characterization/Standards' on Tue, 5 Aug 2003:
>2) Is somebody working on re-charaterization of lightning strikes
>throughout US (eg, the
.std.com;
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: a...@occamnetworks.com
Subject: Re: Lightning Surge Characterization/Standards
In a message dated 8/5/2003, a...@occamnetworks.com writes:
We have products that meet all the Surge requirements
of NEBS GR-1089, FCC-68 and EMC 4-5. But, the sa
.org
Cc: a...@occamnetworks.com
Subject: Lightning Surge Characterization/Standards
Greetings folks,
We have products that meet all the Surge requirements
of NEBS GR-1089, FCC-68 and EMC 4-5. But, the same
products are continuously failing in the field due to
real-world lightning strikes.
I have spok
[mailto:allaman...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:37 PM
To: n...@world.std.com; t...@world.std.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: a...@occamnetworks.com
Subject: Lightning Surge Characterization/Standards
Greetings folks,
We have products that meet all the Surge requirements
of
integrity, intensity, innovation & involvement
From: Stephen Phillips [mailto:step...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:45 PM
To: n...@world.std.com; t...@world.std.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org;
a...@occamnetworks.com
Subject: Re: Lightning Surge Characterization/Stand
In a message dated 8/5/2003, a...@occamnetworks.com writes:
We have products that meet all the Surge requirements
of NEBS GR-1089, FCC-68 and EMC 4-5. But, the same
products are continuously failing in the field due to
real-world lightning strikes.
I have spoken to four other manufacturers who
Anil,
Remember, some of those tests you mention assume a "Primary Protector" is
also in place. In the U.S. maybe you can assume this is true, but can you
worldwide?
Also, for some of those tests, the criteria for failing are
fragmentation/fire, obviously the product would not continue t
Greetings folks,
We have products that meet all the Surge requirements
of NEBS GR-1089, FCC-68 and EMC 4-5. But, the same
products are continuously failing in the field due to
real-world lightning strikes.
I have spoken to four other manufacturers who make
similiar interfaces (DSL) and they all
19 matches
Mail list logo
