RE: Magnetic Defense Complex protects from Artificial Electromagn etic Waves

2007-01-29 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
(I'm almost afraid to ask) Ed, why exactly were you doing this? :-) Bob Richards, NCT "Price, Ed" wrote: A while ago, I tried doing some "brute force" illumination of model rocket igniter squibs with a 200 kW X-band pulse source. While you can make some things "happen", it isn't a trivial tas

RE: Magnetic Defense Complex protects from Artificial Electromagn etic Waves

2007-01-29 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
_ From: Haynes, Tim (SELEX) (UK Capability Green) [mailto:tim.hay...@selex-sas.com] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 1:04 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Magnetic Defense Complex protects from Artificial Electromagn etic Waves Monday has always been a bit dull until now! We

RE: Magnetic Defense Complex protects from Artificial Electromagn etic Waves

2007-01-29 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate Sent: 29 January 2007 09:28 To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: Magnetic Defense Complex protects from Artificial Electromagn etic Waves 95 GHz has a wavelength of 1/95 feet, about 1/8 inch, so each link could be

Re: Magnetic Defense Complex protects from Artificial Electromagn etic Waves

2007-01-29 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message <201048ea81ba0745aca78e4cc8839001c8b...@desmdswms201.des.grplnk.net>, dated Mon, 29 Jan 2007, "Haynes, Tim (SELEX) (UK Capability Green)" writes >Would a chain mail suit be proof against 95GHz or would the RF get >through the gaps between the links? 95 GHz has a wavelength of 1/95

RE: Magnetic Defense Complex protects from Artificial Electromagn etic Waves

2007-01-29 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
the theory. :-) _ From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Price, Ed Sent: 26 January 2007 18:21 To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Magnetic Defense Complex protects from Artificial Electromagn etic Waves *** WARNING *** This mail has originated outside your organization, eith

Re: Magnetic Defense Complex protects from Artificial Electromagn etic Waves

2007-01-26 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message <45ba5388.6...@iglou.com>, dated Fri, 26 Jan 2007, John Barnes writes >Are they connected with the group who drafted the RoHS Directive, you >think? No, the Physical Agents Directive. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from be

RE: Magnetic Defense Complex protects from Artificial Electromagn etic Waves

2007-01-26 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Complex protects from Artificial Electromagn etic Waves While I doubt that this product will do the job, it's the thought that counts! In the ever exciting and fun contest of offense versus defense, in the proud traditions of armor versus anti-armor and counter-measures versus counter-counter-mea

Re: Magnetic Defense Complex protects from Artificial Electromagn etic Waves

2007-01-26 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Ed, Are they connected with the group who drafted the RoHS Directive, you think? John Barnes KS4GL, PE, NCE, NCT, ESDC Eng, ESDC Tech, PSE, SM IEEE dBi Corporation http://www.dbicorporation.com/ - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.Web

RE: Magnetic Defense Complex protects from Artificial Electromagn etic Waves

2007-01-26 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
While I doubt that this product will do the job, it's the thought that counts! In the ever exciting and fun contest of offense versus defense, in the proud traditions of armor versus anti-armor and counter-measures versus counter-counter-measures, we now have Green "snake-oil" that will protect us