rises.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Gremmen
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
>> [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
>> am...@westin-emission.no
>> Sent: maandag 26 novem
>
> Gert Gremmen
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
> am...@westin-emission.no
> Sent: maandag 26 november 2001 13:15
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: Near f
Amund,
The short answer is - essentially unknown.
I tried once long ago, convinced that I could,
to correlate near field measurements on the
bench to far field measurements at 10 meters.
I failed.
There's a variety of reasons for this to happen.
One has to do with the mathematics of t
> am...@westin-emission.no
> Sent: maandag 26 november 2001 13:15
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: Near field vs far field
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> CASE:
> We measure radiated emission on a 21" PC monitor inside a semi-anechoic
> chamber.
>
> I
ster when the distance rises.
Regards,
Gert Gremmen
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
am...@westin-emission.no
Sent: maandag 26 november 2001 13:15
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Near field vs far fi
Hi all,
CASE:
We measure radiated emission on a 21" PC monitor inside a semi-anechoic
chamber.
In a 3m distance we measure 30dBuV/m at 30MHz
What value could we expect at 1m distance ?
I'm not asking for the correct dBuV/m value..., but what really happens when
we go so far into the object nea
6 matches
Mail list logo